首页> 外文学位 >Excess baggage: Weighing the contribution of political and corporate interests in the W.T.O. cases over commercial aircraft subsidies.
【24h】

Excess baggage: Weighing the contribution of political and corporate interests in the W.T.O. cases over commercial aircraft subsidies.

机译:超重行李:权衡W.T.O中政治和公司利益的贡献商用飞机补贴案件。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the second time that the world's top two commercial aviation manufacturers, Boeing and Airbus, went head to head in their long-standing competition over subsidies. In this recent dispute, rather than attempting negotiations (as they did in the early 1990s), both sides instead filed cases against each other at the World Trade Organization (W.T.O.) This manuscript attempts to explain the aggressive re-eruption of this dispute and the absence of a negotiated solution such as the '1992 Agreement.' In doing so, it uncovers the most relevant factors which affected the decision on both sides either to negotiate or to proceed with their cases. These include considerations that have been traditionally associated with this industry in the literature, such as national security, along with other factors drawn from recent scholarship that concludes that the close relationship between political and corporate interests is an important hallmark of the commercial aircraft sector. The study concludes that there were multiple factors that contributed to the aggressive re-eruption of this dispute and that the overarching explanation is financial - specifically, the economic interests of the firms. It further concludes that politics only played a supporting role.;This dissertation is divided into five substantive chapters. After an introduction, the second chapter provides an overview of the history of both Boeing and Airbus and the competition between the two firms up to the current dispute. The third chapter reviews the relevant literature to this dispute, providing a background for the variables chosen for examination during the interviews. A fourth chapter describes the data-gathering method and provides a detailed description of the research findings. The fifth and final chapter serves as a discussion of the research findings and also considers the ramifications that these results may have on understanding trade policy in this sector while giving suggestions for future research.
机译:本文考察了世界排名前两位的商业航空制造商波音公司和空中客车公司第二次在长期的补贴竞争中并肩作战。在最近的这场争端中,双方没有像1990年代初那样尝试进行谈判,而是在世界贸易组织(WTO)相互提起了诉讼。这份手稿试图解释这种争端的激增和缺乏诸如“ 1992年协议”之类的谈判解决方案。在这样做的过程中,它揭示了影响双方决定谈判或处理其案件的最相关因素。这些因素包括传统上与该行业相关的考虑因素,例如国家安全,以及从最近的研究中得出的其他因素,这些因素得出的结论是,政治利益与公司利益之间的密切关系是商用飞机行业的重要标志。该研究的结论是,有多种因素导致该争议的激进再爆发,并且最主要的解释是财务方面的,尤其是企业的经济利益。进一步得出结论,政治只起辅助作用。论文分为五个实质性章节。在介绍之后,第二章概述了波音和空中客车公司的历史,以及两家公司在当前争议之前的竞争。第三章回顾了有关该纠纷的相关文献,为访谈中选择要检查的变量提供了背景。第四章介绍了数据收集方法,并对研究结果进行了详细描述。第五章也是最后一章,是对研究结果的讨论,并考虑了这些结果可能对理解该部门的贸易政策同时为未来研究提供建议所产生的影响。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Miami University.;

  • 授予单位 Miami University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号