首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of bacterial adherence on standard orthodontic brackets and titanium miniscrew implants: An in vivo and in vitro study.
【24h】

A comparison of bacterial adherence on standard orthodontic brackets and titanium miniscrew implants: An in vivo and in vitro study.

机译:标准正畸托槽和钛微螺钉植入物上细菌粘附的比较:体内和体外研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fixed orthodontic appliances including standard brackets and titanium minscrews have the ability to introduce mechanical plaque (biofilm) traps. These orthodontic appliances impair plaque removal, proper oral hygiene, and gingival health11. The purpose of this study is to determine the bacterial accumulation and subsequent biofilm formation on miniscrews and compare it to that of metal orthodontic brackets, in vivo and in-vitro. Plaque samples were taken from the orthodontic brackets and miniscrews in-vivo. S. mutans, Lactobacillus casei, and P. gingivalis were cultured from these samples. In-vitro, a unique experimental set-up was created in the laboratory. Metal brackets and titanium miniscrew implants were placed into three equal lengths of sterile suction tubing. An equal mix of the three bacterial species were added. The tubes were placed in an anaerobic chamber and cultured at specified time intervals including, one week, two weeks, and three weeks. The colonies were counted and all data analyzed through the use of Tukey-Kramer test and ANOVA. Results: ANOVA found no significant differences for the in-vivo portion of the study. There was an overall increase in all three types of bacteria from the one month to two months with a decrease from months two to three. The bacteria found in greatest amount on all appliance types was S. mutans, followed by Lactobacillus casei, and finally, P. gingivalis, however the differences were not significant. For the in-vitro portion of the study ANOVA found significant differences with regard to appliance type. There was more overall bacterial accumulation on the brackets when compared to the miniscrew. Significant differences were found among bacterial type as well. S. mutans was greatest, followed by L. casei , and P. gingivalis. ANOVA found no significant differences with regard to time period. Orthodontic appliances, including bracket and miniscrews, introduce mechanical plaque traps for patients undergoing treatment. It is up to the orthodontist to provide proper oral hygiene regimens for patients with appliances and to help them to eliminate any possibility of excess plaque/biofilm formation on these appliances.
机译:固定的正畸矫治器(包括标准托架和钛细螺钉)可以引入机械牙菌斑(生物膜)陷阱。这些正畸矫治器会损害牙菌斑清除,口腔卫生和牙龈健康11。这项研究的目的是确定微螺钉上的细菌积累和随后的生物膜形成,并将其与金属正畸托槽在体内和体外进行比较。从正畸托槽和微小螺钉体内取噬斑样品。从这些样品中培养变形链球菌,干酪乳杆菌和牙龈假单胞菌。在体外,在实验室中创建了独特的实验装置。将金属支架和钛微螺钉植入物放入三个等长的无菌抽吸管中。加入三种细菌的等量混合。将试管放置在厌氧室中,并在指定的时间间隔(包括一周,两周和三周)下进行培养。通过使用Tukey-Kramer检验和ANOVA对菌落进行计数并分析所有数据。结果:方差分析发现该研究的体内部分无显着差异。从一个月到两个月,所有三种细菌总体上都有增加,而从第二个月到第三个月有所减少。在所有器具类型中发现最多的细菌是变形链球菌,其次是干酪乳杆菌,最后是牙龈卟啉单胞菌,但是差异并不显着。对于研究的体外部分,ANOVA发现在设备类型方面存在显着差异。与小螺钉相比,支架上的细菌总数更大。在细菌类型之间也发现了显着差异。变形链球菌最大,其次是干酪乳杆菌和齿龈假单胞菌。方差分析发现时间段没有显着差异。正畸矫治器(包括托架和微型螺钉)为正在接受治疗的患者引入了机械牙菌斑收集器。正畸医生需要为使用矫治器的患者提供适当的口腔卫生方案,并帮助他们消除在这些矫治器上形成过多牙菌斑/生物膜的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jackfert, Lindsay.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号