首页> 外文学位 >An Examination of the Relationship between Professional Development Providers' Epistemological and Nature of Science Beliefs and Their Professional Development Programs.
【24h】

An Examination of the Relationship between Professional Development Providers' Epistemological and Nature of Science Beliefs and Their Professional Development Programs.

机译:对专业发展提供者的认识论和科学信念的性质及其专业发展计划之间关系的检验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last twenty years in US science education, professional development has emphasized the need to change science instruction from a direct instruction model to a more participatory and constructivist learning model. The result of these reform efforts has seen an increase in science education professional development that is focused on providing teaching strategies that promote inquiry learning to learn science content. Given these reform efforts and teacher responses to professional development, research seems to indicate that whether teachers actually change their practice may depend on the teachers' basic epistemological beliefs about the nature of science. The person who builds the bridge between teacher beliefs and teacher practice is the designer and facilitator of science teacher professional development. Even though these designers and facilitators of professional development are critical to science teacher change, few have studied how these professionals approach their work and what influence their beliefs have on their professional development activities. Eight developers and designers of science education professional development participated in this study through interviews and the completion of an online questionnaire. To examine the relationship between professional development providers' science beliefs and their design, development, and implementation of professional development experiences for science teachers, this study used the Views on Science Education Questionnaire (VOSE), and interview transcripts as well as analysis of the documents from teacher professional development experiences.;Through a basic interpretive qualitative analysis, the predominant themes that emerged from this study suggest that the nature of science is often equated with the practice of science, personal beliefs about the nature of science have a minimal impact on the design of professional development experiences, current reform efforts in science education have a strong influence on the design of professional development, and those providing science education professional development have diverse views about epistemology and the nature of science. The results and conclusions from this study lead to a discussion of implications and recommendations for the planning and design of professional development for science teachers, including the need to making equity and social justice issues an integral part of inquiry and scientific practice.
机译:在美国科学教育的最近二十年中,专业发展强调了将科学指导从直接指导模型转变为更具参与性和建构主义学习模型的必要性。这些改革努力的结果是科学教育专业发展的增加,其重点是提供促进探究学习以学习科学内容的教学策略。鉴于这些改革努力和教师对专业发展的反应,研究似乎表明,教师是否真正改变自己的实践可能取决于教师对科学本质的基本认识论信念。在教师信念和教师实践之间架起桥梁的人是科学教师专业发展的设计师和促进者。尽管这些专业发展的设计师和促进者对于科学教师的变革至关重要,但很少有人研究这些专业人士如何处理他们的工作以及他们的信念对他们的专业发展活动有何影响。八名科学教育专业发展的开发人员和设计师通过访谈和完成在线调查问卷参加了这项研究。为了研究专业发展提供者的科学信念与他们对科学教师的设计,开发和专业发展经验的实施之间的关系,本研究使用了《科学教育问卷调查表》(VOSE),访谈笔录以及文件分析通过教师的专业发展经验。;通过基本的解释性定性分析,本研究中出现的主要主题表明,科学的本质通常等同于科学的实践,关于科学本质的个人信念对科学的影响最小。专业发展经验的设计,当前科学教育的改革努力对专业发展的设计有很大影响,而提供科学教育专业发展的人对认识论和科学的性质有不同的看法。这项研究的结果和结论导致了对理科教师专业发展的规划和设计的影响和建议的讨论,包括需要使平等和社会正义问题成为探究和科学实践的组成部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Garcia Arriola, Alfonso.;

  • 作者单位

    Portland State University.;

  • 授予单位 Portland State University.;
  • 学科 Curriculum development.;Science education.;Epistemology.;Philosophy of science.;Instructional design.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:54:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号