首页> 外文学位 >The reliability and validity of the thin slice technique: Observational research on video recorded medical interactions.
【24h】

The reliability and validity of the thin slice technique: Observational research on video recorded medical interactions.

机译:薄片技术的可靠性和有效性:视频记录的医学交互作用的观察性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Observational research using the thin slice technique has been routinely incorporated in observational research methods, however there is limited evidence supporting use of this technique compared to full interaction coding. The purpose of this study was to determine if this technique could be reliability coded, if ratings are consistent between the first, second and third slice, and if they are indeed representative of full interactions.;Methods: Three 30-second thin slices were sampled from the beginning, middle and end of a full-length video-recorded patient/physician interaction collected a part of a larger research study in a low income urban primary care clinic. Thin slice excerpts and full interactions were rated on five dimensions (liking, attention, coordination, trust and rapport) using a nine point Likert scale ranging from 'none' to 'high' by eight independent coders. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation measure, validity of thin slices was assessed using the Friedman test (non-parametric equivalent of the Repeated measures ANOVA), and the comparison of thin slice coding to full interaction coding was assessed using the Wilcoxon Sign Ranks test (nonparametric version of the Paired t-test).;Results: Thin slice reliability on Likert scale items ranged from .762-.910 with an average IRR of .850. Friedman tests conducted on all five variables (liking, attention, coordination, trust and rapport) comparing the rating of the three slices of the interaction were non-significant. Results of the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test indicated there was a significant difference between the composite thin slice rating (average across three slices) and the full interaction ratings with full interaction variables rated consistently higher than their respective thin slice composite.;Conclusion: Results indicate that thin slices can be reliability coded by independent coders with a high degree of agreement across coders. Observational ratings across thin slices sampled at the beginning middle and end of an interaction were not significantly different demonstrating convergent validity. However, there was a significant difference between ratings obtained from thin slices and ratings obtained from the interaction as a whole, indicating care should be taken when thin slices are used to represent the interaction as a whole.
机译:简介:使用薄片技术的观察研究已常规纳入观察研究方法中,但是与完全交互编码相比,支持这种技术使用的证据有限。这项研究的目的是确定该技术是否可以进行可靠性编码,第一,第二和第三切片之间的评级是否一致以及它们是否确实代表了完整的相互作用。方法:对三个30秒的薄片进行采样从完整的患者/医师视频互动记录的开始,中间和结尾,收集了在低收入城市初级保健诊所进行的一项较大研究的一部分。薄片摘录和完整的互动在八个维度(喜欢,关注,协调,信任和融洽)上由八个独立编码者使用从“无”到“高”的九点李克特量表进行了评级。使用组内相关性度量评估可靠性,使用Friedman检验(重复测量方差分析的非参数等效)评估薄片的有效性,并使用Wilcoxon Sign Ranks检验评估薄片编码与完全交互编码的比较(配对t检验的非参数版本);结果:李克特量表项目的薄片可靠性范围为0.762至.910,平均IRR为.850。对所有三个变量(喜欢,关注,协调,信任和融洽)进行的弗里德曼测试比较了三部分互动的等级,均无统计学意义。 Wilcoxon Signed Rank检验的结果表明,复合材料薄片等级(三个薄片的平均值)与完全相互作用等级之间存在显着差异,而完全相互作用变量的等级始终高于各自的薄片复合材料。结论:结果表明:薄片可以由独立的编码器进行可靠性编码,并且在各个编码器之间具有高度的一致性。交互开始时的中间和结束时对薄片的观察等级没有明显差异,表明收敛效度。但是,从薄片获得的评级与从整个交互获得的评级之间存在显着差异,这表明使用薄片表示整个交互时应格外小心。

著录项

  • 作者

    Foster, Tanina S.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Psychometrics.;Education Evaluation.;Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 83 p.
  • 总页数 83
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:54:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号