首页> 外文学位 >Reading the public comment: The Keystone XL pipeline and future of environmental writing.
【24h】

Reading the public comment: The Keystone XL pipeline and future of environmental writing.

机译:阅读公众意见:Keystone XL管道和环境写作的未来。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the lead up to the 2011 official U.S. State Department decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline---running from the Alberta, Canada Tar Sands to the Gulf of Mexico---the Department held nine public meetings in Fall 2011 in the six U.S. states through which the proposed Keystone XL pipeline project would pass (the Department rejected the proposal; however, a new proposal is under consideration as of this writing). The transcripts of these public meetings are publicly accessible. Understanding the pipeline as a project of trans-national trade and the global circulation of petrochemicals---including global emissions of carbon dioxide--this paper hones in on one region within one U.S. state: the Nebraskan Sandhills, a cattle ranching region of grass-stabilized sand dunes and inter-dunal valleys stretching 20,000-square miles across the north-central part of the state, under which rests a vast hydrological network, including the largest freshwater aquifer in the world --- the Ogallala Aquifer. This essay argues that we can read the Public Comments as a form of poetic expression, paying attention to the ways the State Department transcription process formatted the oral testimonies into an "official" and sanctioned public document -- instituting line-breaks and other syntactical procedures. Using the tools of literary-critical analysis, this paper makes a case that we can read the Comments as a form of documentary poetry - in the tradition of such American modernist poets as Charles Reznikoff, Muriel Rukeyser, and George Oppen - that explore ecological questions while experimenting with lyric structures. The Comments reveal competing environmental stakeholders' stances - on such topics as Prairie systems ecology and the neoliberal economics of private-public capital markets. In doing so, they subsequently express citizens' various understandings of themselves in relation to landscape, ecology, technology, and geo-politics.
机译:在2011年美国国务院就拟议的Keystone XL管道做出决定(从加拿大艾伯塔省的塔尔金沙到墨西哥湾的管道)做出决定之前,美国国务院于2011年秋季在美国的六个国家举行了九次公开会议。说明拟议的Keystone XL管道项目将通过的州(美国商务部拒绝了该建议;但是,在撰写本文时,正在考虑一项新的建议)。这些公开会议的笔录可公开获取。将管道理解为跨国贸易和石化产品全球流通的项目-包括全球二氧化碳的排放-本文在美国一个州内的一个地区内布拉斯坎桑德希尔斯(Nebraskan Sandhills)进行了研究-横跨该州中北部的20,000平方英里的稳定沙丘和沙​​丘间山谷,其下拥有庞大的水文网络,其中包括世界上最大的淡水含水层-Ogallala含水层。本文认为,我们可以将公共评论作为一种诗意表达来阅读,要注意国务院的转录过程将口头证言格式化为“正式的”且得到批准的公共文档的方式-设置换行符和其他句法程序。利用文学批评分析工具,本文提出了一个案例,即我们可以将《评论》作为一种记录诗形式阅读-以查尔斯·雷兹尼科夫,穆里尔·鲁基瑟和乔治·奥本等美国现代派诗人的传统为背景,探讨生态问题在尝试歌词结构时这些评论揭示了竞争环境利益相关者的立场-涉及诸如大草原系统生态学和私人-公共资本市场的新自由主义经济学之类的话题。通过这样做,他们随后表达了公民对自己在景观,生态,技术和地缘政治方面的各种理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Siegel, Eric Mitchell.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Literature American.;Climate Change.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 58 p.
  • 总页数 58
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号