首页> 外文学位 >Institutional Design and Decision-Maker Response: An Investigation of Environmental Policy and Research.
【24h】

Institutional Design and Decision-Maker Response: An Investigation of Environmental Policy and Research.

机译:制度设计与决策者的回应:环境政策与研究的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The development of effective environmental policy and the research to support it is both predicated on and informed by institutions. Institutions affect decision-maker behavior by influencing preferences, framing choices, and establishing expectations. This dissertation employs historical institutionalism as an overarching framework to unify the three essays contained within it. Each essay is concerned with a particular issue area within the field of environmental policy, but all three collectively explore how institutional context affects the behavior of decision-makers and the methods employed by policy scholars. Viewing these collected works through the lens of historical institutionalism provides insight into the mechanics perpetuating institutions in both policy and research. Having thus identified what perpetuates these institutions, one is better equipped to identify the changes necessary to better address today's pressing environmental challenges.;The first essay demonstrates how the literatures surrounding the analysis of property rights regimes in natural resource management are fragmented, leading to incomplete learning and a failure to capture (and therefore understand or model) key dynamics of a situation. The essay shows how institutional change can lead to new insights, new approaches, and increased innovation. It does so through a comparison of property rights frameworks across institutional theory, legal, and economic literatures. It discusses how frameworks can evolve over time to capture an increasing array of research questions, the incentives and constraints which contribute to the path dependency of individual lines of research, and how a failure to evolve may limit their applicability to important, emerging natural resource management issues. The essay concludes with a case study applying a revised property rights framework applied to Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) programs.;The second essay investigates how distinct institutional contexts influence participant decision-making in different segments of the bioenergy market, suggesting that uniform national policies cannot capture the nuanced drivers affecting participant choice and therefore may fail to achieve broad-based producer response. To inform the development of policies best suited to encourage the participation of biomass producers, the essay explores the factors that have been found to be associated with biomass feedstock production decisions in the Southeastern and Midwestern U.S. Using social network analysis to assess the relationships between study variables across different user groups, feedstock types, and geographic areas, the essay shows that the factors used to investigate biomass market participation decisions vary across feedstock type and geographic region.;The third essay examines how institutions influence stakeholder participation in policy reform efforts, how participation can influence institutional design, and how institutional change could facilitate greater involvement from potentially under-served stakeholders. This essay employs a convergent mixed methods design and leverages a large data set of public comments and conservation plans to provide insight into efforts to reform implementation of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Through an exploration of public participation in the development and implementation of policy, the essay illustrates how administrative reform processes could make use of multiple data sources both to draw in those not participating and to gain insights into necessary reforms. For stakeholder applicant and land use types with a greater instance of comment letter submission than plan participation, the essay suggests that existing ESA policies may be ineffective in meeting stakeholder needs. For those applicant and land use types with greater instance of plan participation than comment submission, the essay suggests that valuable input on policy implementation is foregone so long as these users are underrepresented.
机译:有效的环境政策的制定和支持该政策的研究既取决于机构,也应由机构提供信息。机构通过影响偏好,设定选择和建立期望来影响决策者的行为。本文采用历史制度主义作为总体框架,统一其中的三篇论文。每篇文章都涉及环境政策领域中的特定问题领域,但是所有这三篇文章都共同探讨了制度背景如何影响决策者的行为以及政策学者所采用的方法。通过历史制度主义的视角查看这些收集的作品,可以洞察政策和研究中使制度永存的机制。因此,在确定了使这些机构永存的因素之后,便有能力更好地确定必要的变化,以更好地应对当今迫在眉睫的环境挑战。第一篇文章说明了围绕自然资源管理中的产权制度分析的文献是如何分散的,从而导致不完整的学习和未能捕获(因此无法理解或建模)情况的关键动态。这篇文章说明了制度变迁如何导致新的见解,新方法和更多创新。它通过比较制度理论,法律和经济文献中的产权框架来做到这一点。它讨论了框架如何随着时间的推移而发展以捕获越来越多的研究问题,激励机制和制约因素,这些动机和制约因素导致了各个研究领域的路径依赖性,以及发展的失败如何将其限制于新兴的重要自然资源管理的适用性问题。本文以案例研究作为结束,该案例研究采用了适用于减少毁林和森林退化(REDD)计划的经修订的产权框架。第二篇文章调查了不同的制度环境如何影响生物能源市场不同部分的参与者决策。统一的国家政策无法捕捉到影响参与者选择的细微驱动因素,因此可能无法获得广泛的生产者响应。为了指导最适合鼓励生物质生产者参与的政策的制定,本文探讨了与美国东南部和中西部生物质原料生产决策相关的因素。使用社交网络分析评估研究变量之间的关系在不同的用户群体,原料类型和地理区域中,本文表明,用于调查生物质市场参与决策的因素在原料类型和地理区域中有所不同。第三篇文章探讨了机构如何影响利益相关者参与政策改革工作,参与程度会影响机构设计,以及机构变革如何促进潜在的服务不足的利益相关者的更大参与。本文采用融合的混合方法设计,并利用大量公众意见和保护计划的数据集,以深入了解改革《濒危物种法案》(ESA)实施的工作。通过对公众参与制定和执行政策的探索,本文说明了行政改革过程如何利用多个数据源来吸引那些不参与的人,并深入了解必要的改革。对于利益相关者的申请人和土地使用类型,其意见书的提交比计划参与的实例更多,该论文表明,现有的ESA政策可能无法有效地满足利益相关者的需求。对于那些比计划提交更具计划参与性的申请人和土地使用类型,本文表明,只要这些用户的代表性不足,就将放弃对政策实施的宝贵投入。

著录项

  • 作者

    Galik, Christopher S.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Environmental studies.;Public policy.;Environmental economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 143 p.
  • 总页数 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号