首页> 外文学位 >Local Inequality in the Geography of Class-Differentiated Migration.
【24h】

Local Inequality in the Geography of Class-Differentiated Migration.

机译:阶级差异移民的地理区域中的局部不平等。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the relationship between inequality in motion and inequality in place. It is argued that the aggregate effects of household migration have an impact on communities that is more substantial than commonly recognized. Of particular interest, here, is the association between income dispersion in place, as manifest in local income inequality and segregated residential patterns, and income dispersion between places, affected by income inequality within the population of domestically migrating households.; A conceptual framework originally developed to explain migration in terms of an interaction between household and local characteristics (Cadwallader, 1992; Massey, 1990) is applied here as a basis for evaluating class-based differentials in migration. It is argued that social class affects qualitatively distinct migration patterns through each of the following components: 1) individual or household level decision-making, 2) objective characteristics of the places where households move to and from, 3) the interpersonal and interorganizational networks in which households are situated, and 4) the geography of interlocal networks through which households move.;Following the argument that class-differentiated migration patterns are distinct spatial structures, the second question turns to the issue of causality. Specifically, it asks how classdifferentiated migration patterns affect locales. The relationship between migration and local context has largely been theorized and studied in terms of how locales affect migration. The converse remains as an underdeveloped area of research (Cushing & Poot, 2004; Ellis, 2012; Greenwood, 1985; Massey, 1990; Plane & Bitters, 1997). Two possible explanations for the lack of attention to migration's affect on locales -- namely, the significant decline in migration rates since the mid-1980s (Figure 1), and the assumption that migration is epiphenomenal relative to economic base-- are discussed, as are theoretical bases for understanding how migration affects locales. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).;This first chapter introduces two questions concerning household mobility and migration. First, to what extent are the household and structural conditions that affect migration differentiated on the basis of social class? Migration research, as it is largely concerned with the question of why people move, has tended to approach group difference in terms of the individual or household characteristics that distinguish migrants from nonmigrants. In contrast, the primary question addressed here is less concerned with why people move than how social class affects distinct patterns of movement.
机译:这项研究考察了运动不平等与就地不平等之间的关系。有人认为,家庭移民的总体影响对社区的影响比普遍公认的更为广泛。在这里,特别令人感兴趣的是地方收入不平等和居住模式分离所表现的就地收入分散与受国内移民家庭人口中的收入不平等影响的地方之间的收入分散之间的联系。最初开发的概念框架是根据家庭特征和地方特征之间的相互作用来解释移民的(Cadwallader,1992; Massey,1990),此处被用作评估基于阶级的移民差异的基础。有人认为,社会阶层通过以下各个方面影响定性上不同的移民模式:1)个人或家庭一级的决策; 2)家庭往返地点的客观特征; 3)社区内的人际和组织间网络哪个住户位于,以及4)住户通过的区域间网络的地理区域;;继之以阶级区分的移民模式是不同的空间结构的论点之后,第二个问题转向因果关系问题。具体来说,它询问类差异迁移模式如何影响语言环境。迁移和本地环境之间的关系已在很大程度上根据语言环境如何影响迁移进行了理论和研究。相反地​​,这仍然是一个欠发达的研究领域(Cushing&Poot,2004; Ellis,2012; Greenwood,1985; Massey,1990; Plane&Bitters,1997)。讨论了两种可能的原因,即人们对迁移对地区的影响缺乏关注,即自1980年代中期以来迁移率显着下降(图1),以及假设迁移是相对于经济基础为现象的假设。是了解迁移如何影响语言环境的理论基础。 (摘要由UMI缩短。);第一章介绍了有关家庭流动和移民的两个问题。首先,根据社会阶级的不同,影响移民的家庭条件和结构条件在何种程度上有所区别?移徙研究主要关注人们为什么迁徙的问题,因此倾向于根据区分移民和非移徙者的个人或家庭特征来探讨群体差异。相反,这里讨论的主要问题与社会阶层如何影响独特的运动方式相比,其关注点不在于人们为什么运动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones, Karl.;

  • 作者单位

    Vanderbilt University.;

  • 授予单位 Vanderbilt University.;
  • 学科 Social research.;Geography.;Demography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 121 p.
  • 总页数 121
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号