首页> 外文学位 >Clicks or Pulitzers? Web journalists and their work in the United States and France.
【24h】

Clicks or Pulitzers? Web journalists and their work in the United States and France.

机译:点击还是使用钉子?网络记者及其在美国和法国的工作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the process of quantification taking place in web journalism. The internet is transforming journalism in many ways. Yet one of the most fundamental differences between print and online news is the multiplication of internet metrics: web journalists now receive a constant stream of quantitative information about the online popularity of their work.;Does quantification always foster standardization? This dissertation argues instead that metrics take on radically different meanings when they travel between countries. Focusing on the case of online news, I compare the reception of web analytics in two countries, the United States and France, which have different journalistic traditions and relations to market forces.;Drawing on ethnographic analysis of a pair of news websites in the United States and France, as well as additional qualitative and quantitative material, I find that web journalists in both countries are faced with conflicting definitions of journalistic value. Traditional "editorial" evaluation based on original reporting and peer judgment is at odds with "click-based" evaluation, which focuses on the number of page views.;In spite of these commonalities, American and French journalists manage the tension between qualitative and quantitative evaluations in different ways. At the U.S. website, journalists distinguish sharply between editorial and click-based modes of evaluation and keep them separate in their daily work. In contrast, LaPlace's journalists constantly switch back and forth between qualitative and quantitative criteria of value. These different organizational styles manifest themselves in each website's editorial formats, newsrooms routines, and compensation practices.;These differences between the American and French news organizations can usefully be analyzed as distinct "arrangements" between modes of evaluation. Such arrangements stem from the respective trajectories and structures of the American and French journalistic fields. The American journalistic field has a long history of strong market forces, professionalization, and marked specialization. These features emerged more recently in the French journalistic field.;Growing economic pressures in the form of "clicks" affect American and French web journalists in different ways, with important effects on the content of online news in the two countries. This dissertation thus underscores how American and French journalists actively reproduce national differences at a time of economic and technological convergence.
机译:这项研究检查了网络新闻中发生的量化过程。互联网正在以多种方式改变新闻业。然而,印刷新闻和在线新闻之间最根本的区别之一是互联网指标的倍增:网络记者现在不断收到有关其工作在线受欢迎程度的定量信息。量化是否总是促进标准化?相反,本文认为,度量标准在国家之间传播时具有截然不同的含义。重点关注在线新闻的情况,我比较了美国和法国这两个国家的新闻传统和与市场力量的关系不同的国家对网络分析的接受程度;基于对美国两个新闻网站的人种学分析在国家和法国以及其他定性和定量材料方面,我发现两国的网络记者都面临着新闻价值的定义相互矛盾的问题。基于原始报道和同行判断的传统“编辑”评估与“点击”评估不同,后者主要关注页面浏览量。尽管存在这些共同点,但美国和法国的新闻记者仍在处理定性和定量之间的矛盾。以不同的方式进行评估。在美国网站上,记者将编辑和基于点击的评估模式区分开来,并在日常工作中将它们分开。相反,拉普拉斯的记者不断在价值的定性和定量标准之间来回切换。这些不同的组织风格在每个网站的编辑格式,新闻编辑室惯例和薪酬惯例中得到体现。这些美国和法国新闻机构之间的差异可以有效地分析为评估模式之间的“安排”。这种安排源于美国和法国新闻界的各自轨迹和结构。美国新闻界拥有强大的市场力量,专业化和专业化的悠久历史。这些功能在法国新闻界最近才出现。以“点击”形式增长的经济压力以不同的方式影响美国和法国的网络记者,这对两国的在线新闻内容产生了重要影响。因此,本论文强调了在经济和技术融合之时,美国和法国的记者如何积极地再现民族差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Christin, Angele.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 Ethnic studies.;Web studies.;Journalism.;Social research.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 383 p.
  • 总页数 383
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号