首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption
【24h】

Assessment of Policy Alternatives for Mitigation of Barriers to EV Adoption

机译:评估缓解电动汽车采用障碍的政策选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electric Vehicle (EV) has become an increasingly important topic in recent years due to energy and environmental concerns. Governments started to focus on remedies to the upcoming climate change threat and seek solutions through policies and regulations. The negative impact of carbon emissions along with pressure from governmental and social organizations force automotive manufacturers to shift to alternative energy sources. However, EV transition is a complex problem because its stakeholders are very diverse including governments, policy makers, EV manufacturers, and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). Consequently, the barriers to EV adoption are not only consumer oriented, rather exist under many categories. The literature has yet to offer a comprehensive, quantified list of barriers to EV adoption. Although the enacted policies are known, the effectiveness of these policies in mitigating EV adoption is not known.;The objective of this research is to assess policy alternatives for mitigation of EV adoption barriers by developing a comprehensive evaluation model. Barriers are grouped under Social, Technical, Environmental, Economic and Political (STEEP) perspectives that are perceived by decision makers as important for adoption process. The decision model of research links the perspectives to barriers, and policy alternatives. The research implements the hierarchical decision model (HDM) to construct a generalized policy assessment framework.;Data for EV adoption barriers were collected from the abovementioned stakeholders.;Experts' qualitative judgments were collected and quantified using the pair-wise comparison method. The final rankings and effectiveness of policy alternatives were calculated. This research's results showed that the most important perspective is Economic. The top three most important barriers to EV adoption were identified as Initial Cost, Battery Cost, and Entrenched Technology Resistance, respectively. The most effective policy in mitigating EV adoption barriers is R&D Incentives. The research also extended the policy effectiveness research with Policy Effectiveness Curves by reaching out to additional experts. These curves helped determine the effectiveness of each of the 6 policies at different implementation levels. Based on these results, 25 scenarios were applied by combinations of policies at different implementation levels to investigate how the effectiveness of policies can change compared to today's conditions.
机译:由于对能源和环境的关注,近年来,电动汽车(EV)已成为越来越重要的话题。各国政府开始集中精力应对即将到来的气候变化威胁,并通过政策和法规寻求解决方案。碳排放的负面影响以及来自政府和社会组织的压力迫使汽车制造商转向替代能源。但是,电动汽车过渡是一个复杂的问题,因为其利益相关者非常多样化,包括政府,政策制定者,电动汽车制造商和非政府组织(NGO)。因此,电动汽车采用的障碍不仅以消费者为导向,而且存在许多类别。文献尚未提供全面,量化的电动汽车采用障碍清单。尽管已制定的政策是已知的,但这些政策在缓解电动汽车采用方面的有效性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过开发综合评估模型来评估缓解电动汽车采用障碍的替代政策。障碍根据社会,技术,环境,经济和政治(STEEP)的观点进行分组,决策者认为这些观点对于采用过程很重要。研究的决策模型将观点与障碍和政策选择联系起来。该研究采用层次决策模型(HDM)来构建通用的政策评估框架。;从上述利益相关者那里收集有关电动汽车采用障碍的数据;;使用成对比较法收集并量化专家的定性判断。计算了政策选择的最终排名和有效性。这项研究的结果表明,最重要的观点是经济。电动汽车采用的最重要的三个障碍分别是初始成本,电池成本和牢固的技术抵抗力。减轻电动汽车采用障碍的最有效政策是研发激励措施。该研究还通过联系其他专家,扩展了政策有效性曲线的政策有效性研究。这些曲线有助于确定6个策略在不同实施级别上的有效性。根据这些结果,在不同的实施级别上通过组合策略应用了25种情况,以研究与当前条件相比如何改变策略的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yildiz, Bilgehan.;

  • 作者单位

    Portland State University.;

  • 授予单位 Portland State University.;
  • 学科 Management.;Automotive engineering.;Business administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 230 p.
  • 总页数 230
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号