首页> 外文学位 >'You Can't Just Get Up in the Morning and Do It': Bridging the Partner Violence and Substance Use Services Fields
【24h】

'You Can't Just Get Up in the Morning and Do It': Bridging the Partner Violence and Substance Use Services Fields

机译:“您不能只是早上起床就做”:桥接合作伙伴暴力和物质使用服务领域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project addresses three questions: Why, despite need and available models, do so few organizations address both partner violence and substance use? What allows some organizations to address these issues together when most do not? And, when organizations address both partner violence and substance use, what strategies do they use? My answers draw on field theory and multiple kinds of data, including key informant interviews; exploratory, quantitative analysis of organizational practices; and archival research into the histories of both fields. Focused on metropolitan Chicago, a region with a history of support for approaches drawing from both fields, I find very few organizations address both partner violence and substance use. This is due to incompatibilities between the central logics of the two fields at the time of their emergence in the 1970s. Due to ongoing efforts to bring the two fields into greater alignment since the early 1980s, the degree of incapability between their logics has been reduced, although regulatory and funding barriers remain. Despite this, some organizations address both issues together, a practice more common amongst those in the partner violence field, organizations offering services for trauma, and organizations in lower status positions in their primary field. However, most organizations with services for both issues do not actually address them together. Instead, services for both issues exist as separate tracks within the same larger organization. This pattern is the combined results of funding pressures and regulatory barriers, which stem from differences in field-level logics. Organizations addressing both issues together in a substantive way tend to be higher status, underscoring the high level of resources needed to bridge both fields. This suggests the need to ask not just whether organizations address both issues but how they accomplish this work. The success of efforts to support people experiencing both partner violence and substance use hinges on careful navigation of convergences and tensions between fields. Through specifying attention to barriers stemming from field-level logics, resources, regulations, and networks, this dissertation provides a blue print for future efforts in this direction.
机译:该项目解决了三个问题:为什么尽管有需要和可用的模型,却很少有组织同时解决伴侣暴力和吸毒?什么使某些组织在大多数组织不能共同解决这些问题时呢?而且,当组织同时处理伙伴暴力和滥用毒品时,他们使用什么策略?我的答案来自现场理论和多种数据,包括关键线人访谈;组织实践的探索性,定量分析;和档案研究这两个领域的历史。我关注的重点是大都市芝加哥,该地区在这两个领域都支持方法,我发现很少有组织能够解决伴侣暴力和滥用毒品的问题。这是由于1970年代出现时这两个领域的中心逻辑之间的不兼容性。自1980年代初以来,由于不断努力使这两个领域保持更大的一致性,尽管仍然存在监管和资金障碍,但两者之间逻辑上的无能为力程度有所降低。尽管如此,一些组织还是同时解决这两个问题,这在伴侣暴力领域,提供创伤服务的组织以及在其主要领域中处于较低地位的组织中更为普遍。但是,大多数为这两个问题提供服务的组织实际上并未一起解决这些问题。取而代之的是,针对这两个问题的服务在同一个较大的组织中作为单独的路径存在。这种模式是资金压力和监管壁垒的综合结果,其源于领域层面逻辑的差异。以实质性方式一起解决这两个问题的组织往往处于较高的地位,突显了在这两个领域之间架起桥梁所需的大量资源。这表明不仅需要询问组织是否同时解决这两个问题,还需要询问他们如何完成这项工作。支持人们经历伴侣暴力和滥用毒品的努力的成功取决于谨慎地解决各领域之间的趋同和紧张关系。通过指定对来自领域级逻辑,资源,法规和网络的障碍的关注,本论文为将来朝着这个方向的努力提供了蓝图。

著录项

  • 作者

    Armstrong, Elizabeth Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Social work.;Sociology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 325 p.
  • 总页数 325
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号