首页> 外文学位 >Examining instructional efficiency among flashcard drill and practice methods with a sample of first grade students.
【24h】

Examining instructional efficiency among flashcard drill and practice methods with a sample of first grade students.

机译:通过一年级学生的样本检查抽认卡练习和练习方法之间的教学效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

significant number of children in the United States have difficulty learning basic reading skills. The majority of children referred to school psychologists are referred for reading concerns. Unfortunately, the gap between good and poor readers widens over time as more advanced reading skills are built upon basic reading skills. Children with reading difficulties need to be identified early and receive proper reading interventions in order to catch up with their peers. Due to factors such as curricular demands and large class sizes, teachers have limited time to implement academic interventions in the classroom. Interventions that are both effective and efficient allow teachers to provide the greatest amount of instruction within the least amount of time. Further research is needed to identify instructional techniques that are not only effective but are efficient for helping children achieve desired academic outcomes.;The current study examined the instructional effectiveness and efficiency of two word reading interventions on the number of words read accurately and the learning rate of student participants. Specifically, an alternating treatments design was used to compare the effects of the traditional drill and practice technique (presenting only unknown words) and an incremental rehearsal technique (the interspersal of one unknown word between an increasing number of known words). This study extended previous research findings of the positive outcomes of the interventions by holding constant the amount of time allowed for each intervention as opposed to the number of trials provided for each unknown word. Retention, maintenance, generalization, and social validity were also assessed.;Results indicated increased word reading for all five students who participated in the study. Specifically, traditional drill and practice was found to be most effective and efficient on measures of retention and maintenance. Incremental rehearsal was found to be most effective and efficient on a measure of word generalization. Slightly more students preferred the traditional drill and practice intervention. Social validity results indicated that both instructional techniques are a socially valid way to teach word reading skills to students who are behind their peers in reading.
机译:在美国,有相当数量的儿童难以学习基本的阅读技能。推荐给学校心理学家的大多数儿童因阅读方面的问题而被推荐。不幸的是,随着更高级的阅读技能是建立在基本的阅读技能之上的,随着时间的流逝,好读者和差读者之间的鸿沟不断扩大。需要及早发现阅读困难的孩子,并接受适当的阅读干预,以赶上他们的同龄人。由于课程要求和班级规模大等因素,老师在课堂上实施学术干预的时间有限。有效而高效的干预措施使教师能够在最短的时间内提供尽可能多的指导。需要进一步的研究来确定不仅有效而且有效地帮助儿童达到期望的学业成绩的教学技术。;当前的研究针对准确阅读的单词数量和学习率检查了两种单词阅读干预的教学效果和效率。学生参与者。具体来说,采用交替处理设计来比较传统演练和练习技术(仅表示未知单词)和增量排练技术(一个未知单词在越来越多的已知单词之间的穿插)的效果。这项研究通过使每次干预所允许的时间保持恒定(而不是为每个未知单词提供的试验次数)来扩展先前对干预积极成果的研究结果。还对保留,维持,泛化和社会有效性进行了评估。结果表明,参与该研究的所有五名学生的单词阅读均得到提高。具体而言,发现传统的演练和实践在保留和维护方面最有效。渐进式排练被认为是一种最有效的词概括方法。略有更多的学生偏爱传统的练习练习。社会有效性结果表明,两种教学方法都是向在阅读中落后于同龄人的学生教授单词阅读技能的一种社会有效方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Eveleigh, Elisha Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Elementary.;Education Reading.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 209 p.
  • 总页数 209
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号