首页> 外文学位 >Dying Intestate or With a Will on Toxic Estate? An Evaluation of Petroleum Fiscal Systems and The Economic and Policy Implications for Decommissioning of Onshore Crude Oil Fields in Nigeria
【24h】

Dying Intestate or With a Will on Toxic Estate? An Evaluation of Petroleum Fiscal Systems and The Economic and Policy Implications for Decommissioning of Onshore Crude Oil Fields in Nigeria

机译:死于无遗嘱或对有毒财产有遗嘱?尼日利亚石油财政体系评估及陆上原油油田退役的经济和政策意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many giant fields in the world like the onshore fields in Nigeria which were initially discovered over half a century ago, have begun to see consistent decline in production and profit, and are gradually entering into the economic end of field life or decommissioning phase. Characteristically, in most regions with mature fields, the large multinational oil companies have begun to sell their oil fields to small indigenous companies who may not be financially robust enough to complete the decommissioning, when it occurs. Because of the societal impact and pervasiveness of the oil industry, if an investor fails to properly decommissioning the infrastructures, a responsible government will have to pick the bill for the proper decommissioning. Or in the alternative with an irresponsible government, society suffers the socioeconomic, political, health and environmental impact. Therefore, society needs to be effectively engaged in the development of a sustainable decommissioning policy framework, which is hindered if society is uninformed and lacks access to pertinent information.;Currently, there is abysmal information in the public space on the cost of decommissioning liabilities of oil fields, especially in developing countries like Nigeria. The public also need simple interpretative ways to determine the vulnerability of a county or entity to decommissioning default risk and the imminence of a default risk. Furthermore, there is currently, no way to benchmark the level of maturity or level of preparedness for decommissioning phase such that countries and entities can identify their gaps to a sustainable decommissioning policy framework and define a roadmap to close the gap. These are important challenges to vigorous public participation, which is an essential requirement for development and implementation of any sustainable public policy for a public issue like decommissioning of crude oil fields.;This study adopted several research methods to develop and introduce a new cost estimating methodology that uses publicly declared cost of asset retirement obligations (ARO) to determine a plausible cost estimate range for decommissioning liabilities. It was demonstrated with Nigeria onshore crude oil fields, which it determined to have a rough order of magnitude cost estimate for decommissioning liabilities that could be as high as $3 billion. Secondly, it also introduced decommissioning coverage ratio (DCR) and decommissioning coverage ratio vector (DCRV) as new metrics to evaluate the vulnerability to and imminence of decommissioning default risk. In demonstrating these new metrics, this study determined that the imminence of and vulnerability to decommissioning default risk for the onshore crude oil fields in Nigeria, with respect to any of the available revenue stream, is high. Thirdly, it developed a graded scale maturity model for sustainable decommissioning of petroleum fields. The model described as Fairbanks maturity model for sustainable decommissioning in the petroleum industry, has five progressive levels of maturity. It leveraged the methodology used for similar maturity models developed in other industries and for business management, and a comparative analysis of level of progress in decommissioning frameworks between some countries with leading decommissioning experience in the petroleum industry, to develop the Fairbanks maturity model. Based on the Fairbanks maturity model, frameworks for sustainable decommissioning of Nigeria onshore crude oil fields were evaluated to be at Level 1, Ad hoc maturity level, which is the lowest maturity level. Recommendations to close the identified gaps were also were made. These methodologies can be applied to any petroleum producing region or entity in the world and are advancements to the frontier of knowledge in the management of decommissioning phase for petroleum fields in general and Nigeria onshore fields in particular.
机译:世界上许多大型油田,例如尼日利亚的陆上油田,最初是在半个多世纪前发现的,其生产和利润一直在持续下降,并逐渐进入油田寿命的经济终结或退役阶段。典型的是,在大多数拥有成熟油田的地区,大型跨国石油公司已经开始将其油田出售给小型的本土公司,而这些公司的财务实力可能不足以在退役时完成退役。由于石油行业的社会影响和普遍性,如果投资者未能适当停用基础设施,则负责任的政府将必须选择适当的停用方案。或者在不负责任的政府的替代方案中,社会遭受社会经济,政治,健康和环境的影响。因此,社会需要有效地参与制定可持续的退役政策框架,如果社会不了解情况并且缺乏相关信息的获取,这将受到阻碍。当前,公共空间中关于退役债务成本的信息非常糟糕。油田,特别是在尼日利亚等发展中国家。公众还需要简单的解释方法来确定县或实体退役违约风险的脆弱性和违约风险的迫在眉睫。此外,目前尚无基准来确定退役阶段的成熟度或准备水平,以使各国和实体可以确定其与可持续退役政策框架之间的差距,并确定缩小差距的路线图。这些是大力开展公众参与的重要挑战,这是开发和实施任何可持续公共政策以解决诸如油田退役等公共问题的基本要求。本研究采用了几种研究方法来开发和引入新的成本估算方法它使用公开宣布的资产报废义务(ARO)成本来确定退役负债的合理成本估算范围。尼日利亚在岸的原油油田就证明了这一点,它决定对退役负债的成本估算进行粗略的估算,其费用可能高达30亿美元。其次,它还引入了退役覆盖率(DCR)和退役覆盖率向量(DCRV)作为评估退役违约风险的脆弱性和迫在眉睫的新指标。在论证这些新指标时,本研究确定,就任何可用收入来源而言,尼日利亚陆上原油油田退役违约风险的迫切性和脆弱性很高。第三,为油田的可持续退役开发了分级规模的成熟度模型。被描述为石油行业可持续退役的费尔班克斯成熟度模型的模型具有五个渐进的成熟度级别。它利用了在其他行业中开发的类似成熟度模型和业务管理所使用的方法,并比较了在石油行业具有领先退役经验的一些国家之间的退役框架进展水平的比较分析,以开发费尔班克斯成熟度模型。根据费尔班克斯成熟度模型,尼日利亚陆上原油油田可持续退役的框架被评估为1级,即席成熟度级别,这是最低成熟度级别。还提出了弥补已发现差距的建议。这些方法可应用于世界上任何一个石油生产地区或实体,并且是一般油田尤其是尼日利亚陆上油田退役阶段管理知识前沿的进步。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Alaska Fairbanks.;

  • 授予单位 University of Alaska Fairbanks.;
  • 学科 Petroleum engineering.;Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 384 p.
  • 总页数 384
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号