首页> 外文学位 >Turf wars and corporate sponsorship: Challenges in the food system and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
【24h】

Turf wars and corporate sponsorship: Challenges in the food system and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

机译:地盘战争和企业赞助:食品系统和营养与营养学研究院的挑战。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the leading professional organization for registered dietitians (RDs)---globally---with over 75,000 members. Professional organizations are often overlooked in communication scholarship. However, the Academy offers a rich setting for researching occupational identities, health activism, and neoliberalism.;I used semi-structured interviews to explore how taken-for-granted discourses, power relationships, and unquestioned norms are challenged, reinforced, and (re)constructed within the Academy. Specifically, this study analyzed two challenges to the Academy and the dietetics profession: claims to professional expertise and a debate surrounding the Academy's corporate sponsorship. My findings suggest that the profession, which happens to be predominantly female, is struggling with issues of marginalization. RDs described their expertise through a rhetorical turf war---in which they defined themselves against nutritionists---to help elevate their profession. Further, I found that the Academy has a sub-group of health activists that are unified through their holistic approach to nutrition. These health activists attempted to address complaints about the Academy's corporate sponsorship program but lacked a unified vision for their efforts.;By researching the Academy, I hope to contribute new understandings about how professional organizations, discourses of expertise, and corporate sponsorship contribute and influence the public's understandings of health and nutrition. While my results have practical and theoretical implications for RDs and the Academy, they also have broader implications for understanding power relationships and hidden discourses within our complex, dynamic food system.
机译:营养与营养学会是全球注册营养师(RDs)的领先专业组织,成员超过75,000。专业组织经常在交流奖学金中被忽视。但是,该学院为研究职业身份,健康行动主义和新自由主义提供了丰富的环境。;我使用半结构化访谈,探讨了如何挑战,强化和(当然)重新审视理所当然的话语,权力关系和毫无疑问的规范。 )在学院内构建。具体而言,本研究分析了学院和饮食学专业面临的两个挑战:对专业知识的要求以及围绕学院公司赞助的辩论。我的研究结果表明,该行业恰好是女性,但正面临着边缘化问题的困扰。 RD通过一场激烈的草皮大战描述了他们的专业知识-他们在定义中反对营养学家-以帮助提升他们的职业。此外,我发现该学院有一个健康激进主义者小组,通过对营养的整体方法进行统一。这些健康激进主义者试图解决有关学院的公司赞助计划的投诉,但缺乏统一的愿景。通过研究学院,我希望对专业组织,专业知识和公司赞助如何贡献和影响协会做出新的理解。公众对健康和营养的理解。尽管我的研究结果对RD和Academy具有实际和理论意义,但它们对于理解我们复杂而动态的食物系统中的权力关系和隐秘话语也具有更广泛的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smith, Kristin K.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.;
  • 学科 Speech Communication.;Sociology Organizational.;Economics General.;Health Sciences Nutrition.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 141 p.
  • 总页数 141
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号