首页> 外文学位 >Guardianship of the Elderly - Salient Associated Aspects and the Law of Incapacity in Pennsylvania
【24h】

Guardianship of the Elderly - Salient Associated Aspects and the Law of Incapacity in Pennsylvania

机译:老年人监护-宾夕法尼亚州的显着相关方面和无行为能力法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Guardianship was introduced during the ancient Roman times of Cicero. Modern American guardianship law originated in English common law and a statute, De Praerogative Regis, i.e., the king's prerogative, dating from the beginning of the fourteenth century.;Pursuant to this statute, jurisdiction over persons "of unsound mind" is believed to have been taken by the crown from the feudal lords and exercised as part of the royal prerogative. De Praerogative Regis provided that "the King shall have the custody of the lands of natural fools, taking the profits of them ... and shall find them their necessaries" and that "the King shall provide when any, that before time hath had his wit and memory, happen to fail of his wit ... that their lands and tenements shall be safely kept ... and the residue beside their sustentation shall be kept to their use, to be delivered unto them when they come to their right mind ..." Thus, it is clear that from a very early date, there was a perceived public interest in looking after the assets of any person "whose wit and memory have failed.";The need for guardianship was determined by an inquisition and an investigation of the facts before a sworn jury composed of twelve men. The emphasis of early guardianship laws on property matters can be found by the exercise of decision-making capacity on behalf of incapacitated persons, through the Exchequer, or Finance Minister, as an aspect of tax collection. The use of guardianship to safeguard a ward's personal well-being is of more recent vintage.;The ethical justification for state legislative and judicial imposition of a surrogate decision maker for an incapacitated individual, with regard to both personal and financial decisions, is found in two fundamental and related principles. The principle of non-maleficence instructs us to "do no harm" to others, while the related precept of beneficence encourages us to help others who need assistance; that is, to affirmatively "do good" unto others. These ethical propositions have been transformed into the legal doctrine of parens patriae, or father of the land; the inherent authority and responsibility of a benevolent society to intervene, even over objection, to protect people who cannot protect themselves. As a result, instead of abandoning cognitively incapacitated individuals to a superficial meaningless autonomy to make self-harmful decisions or to neglect their own basic needs, the state may exercise its authority to protect even unwilling disabled individuals from their own folly or intellectual deficits.;This thesis first discusses certain salient associated aspects of guardianship as it relates to the elderly. It then examines the law in Pennsylvania relative to Incapacitated Person, 20 Pa. C.S.A. §5501, et seq., presenting a review for the legal community of Chapter 55 of the Probate, Estates and Fiduciaries Code, in an effort to inform unwitting jurists and practitioners alike, of possible awaiting pitfalls.
机译:监护是在古罗马西塞罗时期引入的。现代美国监护法起源于英国普通法和一部法规,即De Praerogative Regis(即国王的特权),其历史可追溯至14世纪初。;根据该法规,对“精神不健全”的人的管辖权据信具有被封建领主从王室手中夺取,并作为王室特权的一部分行使。德·普雷罗格里奇·里吉斯(De Praerogative Regis)规定:“国王应保管自然傻瓜的土地,抢夺他们的利益……并找到他们的必需品”,并规定:“国王应提供任何在其以前曾拥有过的傻瓜。机智和记忆,碰巧因他的机智而失败...应妥善保管他们的土地和房屋...并应保留它们的残余物,以备不时之需……”因此,很显然,从很早的时候开始,照顾“机智和记忆力已经失败”的任何人的资产就有了公众的利益。在由十二个人组成的宣誓陪审团面前调查事实。可以通过财政部或财政部长代表无行为能力的人行使决策能力,作为税收的一个方面,可以发现早期监护权法律对财产事务的重视。使用监护权来保护病房的个人福祉是近来的历史。在以下方面,从法律上证明了州立法和司法机构对无行为能力的个人强加代人决策者的道理依据:两项基本原则和相关原则。非恶意的原则指示我们“不伤害他人”,而有关的慈善理念则鼓励我们帮助需要帮助的其他人。也就是说,肯定地对他人“行善”。这些道德命题已被转化为“祖国”或“土地之父”的法律学说。仁慈社会固有的权威和责任,即使是反对也要干预,以保护无法自我保护的人们。结果,国家可能放弃行使认知上无行为能力的人一种肤浅的,毫无意义的自主权来做出自残的决定或忽视他们自己的基本需求,而可以行使权力保护甚至不愿做残障的残疾人免受自己的愚蠢或智力缺陷。本文首先讨论了与老年人有关的监护的某些重要方面。然后,它审查了宾夕法尼亚州有关丧失行为能力的人的法律,该行为者为20 Pa。C.S.A. §5501等,对《遗嘱认证,遗产和信托法典》第55章的法律界进行了审查,以期将可能面临的陷阱告知不知情的法学家和从业人员。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yeager, Stephen Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Nevada, Reno.;

  • 授予单位 University of Nevada, Reno.;
  • 学科 Judaic studies.
  • 学位 M.J.S.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号