首页> 外文学位 >Electronic Surveillance as a Counterterrorism Tool: Is Technology a Viable Strategy?
【24h】

Electronic Surveillance as a Counterterrorism Tool: Is Technology a Viable Strategy?

机译:电子监视作为一种反恐工具:技术是可行的策略吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electronic surveillance is one of the policy options governments may employ when combating terrorist groups. Public discourse often involves concerns that such programs may substantially reduce citizens' privacy while providing marginal, if any, gains against terrorists. This study provides much-needed empirical data on the impact of electronic surveillance on terrorism.;The evidence I generate---examining data from 1970 through 2016, using a multivariate negative binomial panel regression model for longitudinal data---supports a hypothesis that the presence of electronic surveillance laws and the related government surveillance capacity decreases both the incidence of terrorist attacks and the number of individuals killed in terrorist attacks. These findings complement, and may be integrated into, broader scholarly work that finds that when constraints on government institutions are relaxed, they are more effective at counterterrorism. These data provide grounds for additional study in this domain. Qualitative, comparative case studies, for example, that examine the relationship among electronic surveillance and other counterterrorism strategies in which the nation-state is the unit of analysis, could reveal an optimal mix of strategies to limit terrorist activity. This study may help inform the debate over the scope of electronic surveillance and personal privacy in nation states.
机译:电子监视是政府在打击恐怖组织时可以采用的政策选择之一。公众话语常常引起人们的担忧,即此类程序可能会大大降低公民的隐私权,同时给恐怖分子带来边际收益(如果有的话)。这项研究提供了有关电子监视对恐怖主义影响的急需的经验数据。;我生成的证据-使用多变量负二项式面板回归模型对纵向数据进行了研究,研究了1970年至2016年的数据-支持了以下假设电子监视法律的存在和相关的政府监视能力降低了恐怖袭击的发生率和恐怖袭击中丧生的人数。这些发现补充并可以整合到更广泛的学术研究中,这些研究发现,放松对政府机构的限制后,它们在反恐方面会更加有效。这些数据为该领域的进一步研究奠定了基础。例如,定性,比较案例研究检查了电子监视与其他以国家为分析单位的反恐战略之间的关系,可以揭示限制恐怖活动的最佳战略组合。这项研究可能有助于为有关民族国家电子监视和个人隐私范围的辩论提供信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Macpherson, Andrew.;

  • 作者单位

    Northeastern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northeastern University.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 94 p.
  • 总页数 94
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号