首页> 外文学位 >Gender Discourse Patterns in the Supervisory Relationship
【24h】

Gender Discourse Patterns in the Supervisory Relationship

机译:监督关系中的性别话语模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the expanding diversity of the United States, there is an increased likelihood of opportunities for supervisors to oversee clinicians that come from diverse backgrounds. This diversity can be based on gender. It is essential to examine the supervisory relationship when there is diversity in gender. By doing so, better practices can be established between the supervisor and supervisee, which creates a better relationship and increased learning opportunities for the supervisee. The improved learning on the part of the supervisee can improve client therapeutic outcomes. Interactions that occur between supervisors and supervisees in a supervisory relationship were examined. The following question was examined in this research.;What interaction features are evidenced between supervisors and supervisees who differ in gender?;The research methodology that was used for this study was a descriptive qualitative approach that included an inductive and deductive component to data analysis. A qualitative content analysis approach to data analysis was also used within this study. Qualitative content analysis is flexible in that it uses both inductive and deductive approaches to data analysis (Elo & Kyngas, 2008). In the inductive approach to data analysis, codes, categories, or themes were developed through the data. In the deductive approach, preconceived codes or categories were derived from previous research. For this study, a modified version of the Blumberg Interaction Analysis System (BIA) was used for the developed codes and categories in the deductive analysis. Within this approach, the Symbolic Interactionism theory was the lens to view the data. The supervisor and supervisees were selected using the criteria of intensity to allow the data to be information rich (Miles & Huberman, 1994). The supervisors were selected from universities and school systems in the southeastern United States. All participants were paired in the same setting -- that is, the supervisor and the supervisee are in a paired relationship within the same university setting or school system and vary according to gender.;It is essential to examine the supervisory relationship when there is diversity in gender. By doing so, better practices can be established between the supervisor and supervisee, which then creates a better relationship. The improved relationship allows for more learning on the part of the supervisee, which can improve therapeutic outcomes. Interactions that occur between participants in a supervisory relationship were examined. The findings revealed that male and female supervisors speak more than supervisees, and female supervisees speak more than male supervisees. Male supervisors gave more directives than female supervisors. When the male supervisors gave directives, it was only to male supervisees. This is to be expected, because males tend to be more direct with their suggestions for improvements than do females. Male supervisors asked for opinions more than female supervisors. Those meetings with female supervisors tended to be more relaxed with free-flowing conversation than those meetings lead by male supervisors. Female supervisors tend to be more nurturing in their interactions with their supervisees. They are more likely to establish a relationship by first engaging in social exchanges and have more comfortable and productive conversations. They also gave more support and empathy than male supervisors when speaking with supervisees. Strong supervisory relationships allow for the supervisee to have a voice in the learning process. Supervisees can feel empowered to express opinions and ask questions, which can allow for a deeper dialogue. Supervisees learn more when they feel free to interact with the supervisor and are comfortable in the relationship. Because the findings show that female supervisees tend to have a more diminished voice in the supervisory relationship than male supervisees, it is important that supervisors establish an environment where the supervisee can feel valued.
机译:随着美国多元化的发展,主管人员监督来自不同背景的临床医生的可能性越来越大。这种多样性可以基于性别。当性别存在差异时,检查监督关系至关重要。这样,可以在主管和被监督者之间建立更好的做法,从而为被监督者建立更好的关系并增加学习机会。监督者改进的学习可以改善客户的治疗效果。检查了在监督关系中主管和被监督者之间的互动。在本研究中研究了以下问题:性别不同的主管和被监督者之间有什么互动特征?这项研究使用的研究方法是描述性的定性方法,包括对数据分析的归纳和演绎成分。本研究还使用了定性的内容分析方法进行数据分析。定性内容分析非常灵活,因为它使用归纳法和演绎法进行数据分析(Elo和Kyngas,2008年)。在归纳式数据分析方法中,通过数据开发了代码,类别或主题。在演绎方法中,先入为主的代码或类别是从先前的研究中得出的。对于本研究,将布隆伯格互动分析系统(BIA)的修改版本用于演绎分析中已开发的代码和类别。在这种方法中,象征性互动理论是查看数据的镜头。使用强度标准选择监督者和被监督者,以使数据具有丰富的信息(Miles&Huberman,1994)。主管是从美国东南部的大学和学校系统中选拔的。所有参与者都在相同的环境中配对-也就是说,主管和被监督者在同一所大学环境或学校系统中处于配对关系,并且根据性别而异;在存在多样性的情况下检查监管关系至关重要在性别上。这样,可以在主管和被监管者之间建立更好的做法,从而建立更好的关系。改善的关系允许被监管者进行更多的学习,从而可以改善治疗效果。研究了监督关系中参与者之间发生的互动。调查结果表明,男性和女性上司的话语要比被监督者多,而女性被监督者的话语要多于男性。男性主管比女性主管给出了更多的指示。当男性上司下达指令时,它仅适用于男性上司。这是可以预料的,因为男性比女性更倾向于直接提出改善建议。男性主管比女性主管要求更多的意见。与女监事的会议比起男监事的会议,往往畅通无阻。女主管往往在与被督导者的互动中更多地被培养。他们更可能通过首先进行社交交流来建立关系,并且进行更舒适和富有成效的对话。与被督导人交谈时,他们比男性上司给予更多的支持和同情。强大的监督关系使被监督者可以在学习过程中发表意见。主管可以感到有权表达意见和提出问题,从而可以进行更深入的对话。主管们可以随时与主管互动,并且对关系感到满意,从而可以学到更多。由于调查结果表明,女性监督者在监督关系中的声音往往比男性监督者的声音减弱,因此,重要的是,监督者应建立一个让监督者感到被重视的环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Leak, Emily Y.;

  • 作者单位

    University of West Georgia.;

  • 授予单位 University of West Georgia.;
  • 学科 Speech therapy.;Teacher education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 155 p.
  • 总页数 155
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然地理学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号