首页> 外文学位 >Development Goals for the New Millennia: Discourse Analysis of the Evolution of the 2001 Millennium Development Goals and 2015 Sustainable Development Goals.
【24h】

Development Goals for the New Millennia: Discourse Analysis of the Evolution of the 2001 Millennium Development Goals and 2015 Sustainable Development Goals.

机译:新千年的发展目标:2001年千年发展目标和2015年可持续发展目标演变的话语分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Through critical discourse analysis, this thesis explores the construction of poverty and development within and across the United Nations Millennium Development Goals and the proposed post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals texts. The proposed post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals frame the international development landscape for the next 15 years, therefore it becomes imperative for civil society to understand their dominant economic schemes for poverty alleviation in order to adopt or oppose similar methods of poverty abatement. Deductively, this thesis investigates Keynesianism and neoliberalism, the dominant economic discourses whose deployments within the goals have shaped transnational frameworks for interpreting and mitigating poverty. It assesses the failures of the Millennium Development Goals, as articulated both by its creators and critics, and evaluates the responsiveness of the United Nations in the constitution of the proposed post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals in relation to these critiques through the lens of liberal feminist and World Social Forum discourses. These activist and oppositional social discourses embody competing values, representations, and problem-solution frames that challenge and resist the dominant economic discourses in both sets of goals. Additionally, this thesis uses an inductive approach to critically analyze both sets of goals in order to identify any emergent discursive frameworks grounded in each text that assist in understanding the problems of, and solutions to, poverty.
机译:通过批判性话语分析,本文探讨了联合国千年发展目标以及拟议的2015年后可持续发展目标文本之内和之间的贫困与发展问题。拟议的2015年后可持续发展目标构想了未来15年的国际发展格局,因此,公民社会必须了解其主导的减贫经济计划,以采用或反对类似的减贫方法。演绎性地,本文研究了凯恩斯主义和新自由主义,这是占主导地位的经济话语,它们在目标范围内的部署塑造了解释和减轻贫困的跨国框架。它评估了创造者和批评者都明确指出的千年发展目标的失败,并通过自由女权主义者的视角评估了联合国在拟议的2015年后可持续发展目标的宪法中对这些批评的回应。和世界社会论坛的话语。这些激进的和对立的社会话语体现了相互竞争的价值观,表象和问题解决框架,这些挑战,挑战和抵抗两种目标中的主导经济话语。此外,本文采用归纳法对这两组目标进行了批判性分析,以识别每一篇文本中所出现的,有助于理解贫困问题和解决方案的新兴话语框架。

著录项

  • 作者

    Briant, Janie.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Communication.;Economics.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 110 p.
  • 总页数 110
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号