首页> 外文学位 >A History of Hoarding: A Comparative Test of Tilly's Durable Inequality Theory to Explore Opportunity Hoarding in the Jim Crow, Civil Rights, and Post-Civil Rights Eras.
【24h】

A History of Hoarding: A Comparative Test of Tilly's Durable Inequality Theory to Explore Opportunity Hoarding in the Jim Crow, Civil Rights, and Post-Civil Rights Eras.

机译:Ho积的历史:对Tilly的持久不平等理论的比较检验,以探索吉姆·克劳,民权和后民权时代的机会Ho积。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historically, opportunity hoarding strategies (i.e., tactics to acquire and monopolize valuable resources) such as racial threat (i.e., overt discrimination resulting from large proportions of black residents), racial residential segregation, and jailing have influenced the labor market access of both blacks and whites. This research evaluates how opportunity hoarding strategies influenced the unemployment rates of African American and white men in 1940, 1960, and 1980. I address these relationships by primarily drawing from Tilly's (1999) Durable Inequality Theory (DIT). I also draw from Western's (2006) adjusted unemployment rate to analyze how acknowledging those who are imprisoned in the unemployment rate impacts the relationships between opportunity hoarding and unemployment. In a diverse sample of 136 U.S. urban counties, net of region, percent change in retail employment, and the Talented Tenth, the findings from my Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression suggest that opportunity hoarding practices were influential on the labor market participation of both black and white males in 1940, 1960, and 1980. Focusing on the results for the standard unemployment rates shows that whether observing white or black males, proportion black never impacted unemployment, segregation was influential in each era, while jailing was only influential in 1980. Focusing on the results for the adjusted unemployment rates reveals that proportion black and segregation were influential in 1940 and 1960, while jailing was actually influential in each era. Utilizing the results for the adjusted unemployment rates shows that the results limited to the standard unemployment rate are slightly flawed and overlook important indicators of unemployment. They also show that the failure of racial threat and the ghetto to effectively marginalize blacks and hoard opportunities for whites led to the use of the criminal justice system as the opportunity hoarding mechanism of choice for American society.
机译:从历史上看,机会strategies积策略(即,获取和垄断宝贵资源的策略),例如种族威胁(即,由于大量黑人居民造成的明显歧视),种族隔离和监狱,已经影响了黑人和黑人的劳动力市场准入。白人。这项研究评估了机会ho积策略如何影响1940、1960和1980年非裔美国人和白人的失业率。我主要通过借鉴Tilly(1999)的持久不平等理论(DIT)来解决这些关系。我还从Western(2006年)的调整后失业率中得出结论,以分析承认失业率被囚禁的人如何影响opportunity积与失业之间的关系。在我对美国136个城市县的抽样调查中,扣除区域,零售业就业变化百分率和第10名人才,我的普通最小二乘(OLS)回归结果表明,机会ho积做法对双方的劳动力市场参与都有影响1940年,1960年和1980年的黑人和白人。关注标准失业率的结果表明,无论观察白人还是黑人,黑人比例从未影响失业,种族隔离在每个时代都有影响,而监禁在1980年才有影响。着眼于调整后的失业率的结果表明,黑人和种族隔离的比例在1940年和1960年具有影响力,而监狱实际上在每个时代都具有影响力。将结果用于调整后的失业率表明,限于标准失业率的结果略有缺陷,并且忽略了重要的失业指标。他们还表明,种族威胁和贫民窟未能有效地使黑人和白人的ho积机会边缘化,这导致了将刑事司法制度作为美国社会选择的opportunity积机会的机制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Patton, Charles Lindell.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Sociology.;Public policy.;American history.;Ethnic studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 180 p.
  • 总页数 180
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号