首页> 外文学位 >Measuring the impact of 9/11 on the functionality of local emergency planning committees and the public disclosure of hazardous chemical information
【24h】

Measuring the impact of 9/11 on the functionality of local emergency planning committees and the public disclosure of hazardous chemical information

机译:衡量9/11对地方应急计划委员会的功能以及危险化学品信息的公开披露的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The release of a toxic chemical into the drinking water near Charleston, West Virginia, early in 2014 brought national attention to yet another toxic chemical incident. When local and state officials announced their ignorance of the potential health hazards associated with the particular chemical, it raised questions about the functionality of the Kanawha Putnam Emergency Planning Committee, a Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) created as a result of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA). Local officials' lack of awareness was particularly curious, because that very same county was the site of the Union Carbide chemical leak that stimulated Congress to create and pass the EPCRA. In the post-9/11 homeland security environment, knowing of the existence of a hazard plan -- particularly in a community where an incident has occurred -- would seem to be of paramount concern. In addition, considering the community right-to-know provisions of the EPCRA, what are the policies for the release of the sensitive information to the public in a post-9/11 world?;A review of the literature produced no current research on LEPCs related to either functionality or to release of hazardous chemical information to the community. The most recent survey was conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2008. Peer-reviewed scholarly research has not been published since 2001. It was determined that a survey instrument was necessary to determine the impact of the events of 9/11 on the functionality of LEPCs, and on their policies governing the release of hazardous chemical information to the public.;An instrument was developed using a combination of questions derived from the review of literature about prior inquiries into LEPCs or release of information in the wake of 9/11, standard research methodology and questions were adapted from the 1999 and 2008 National LEPC surveys. The instrument's content was validated by a jury of experts, revised, and pretested with 26 LEPC leaders from two states. The data was analyzed for internal correlation (consistency) using Cronbach's alpha. The Cronbach's alpha was recorded as .834, indicating strong reliability for the 17 scaled items of the 29 total questions.;Preliminary data from the pretest suggested that the events of 9/11 did not have a statistically significant impact on the functionality of LEPCs, but did result in major measurable changes in the policies related to the release of sensitive hazardous chemical information to the public. Further validation and refinement of the instrument is necessary before wider usage. The information gathered is valuable, however, as it can guide policymakers concerning the efficacy of current legislation, regulations, and policy. It can also inform them if legislation, regulations, and/or policy require modification to ensure the intent of the original legislation (EPCRA) is being met.
机译:2014年初,西弗吉尼亚州查尔斯顿附近的饮用水中释放了有毒化学物质,引起了全国对另一起有毒化学物质事件的关注。当地方和州官员宣布对与该特定化学品相关的潜在健康危害不了解时,它引起了对Kanawha Putnam紧急计划委员会的功能的质疑,Kanawha Putnam紧急计划委员会是由紧急计划和应急计划建立的地方紧急计划委员会1986年《社区知情权法》(EPCRA)。当地官员的意识不足尤其令人好奇,因为那个县是联合碳化物化学品泄漏的地点,这刺激了国会创建并通过了EPCRA。在9/11后的国土安全环境中,了解危害计划的存在-特别是在发生事件的社区中-似乎至关重要。此外,考虑到EPCRA的社区知情权条款,在9/11后的世界中,向公众发布敏感信息的政策是什么?与功能或向社区发布危险化学信息有关的LEPC。最近的一次调查是由美国环境保护署(EPA)于2008年进行的。自2001年以来,同行评议的学术研究一直没有发表。已确定,必须使用一种调查工具来确定9/11事件对该功能的影响。 LEPC及其关于向公众发布危险化学信息的政策。;一种工具是结合对先前对LEPC进行询问或9/11之后信息发布的文献回顾得出的问题组合起来开发的,标准的研究方法和问题摘自1999年和2008年的全国LEPC调查。该仪器的内容已由专家评审团验证,修订并与来自两个州的26位LEPC领导人进行了预测试。使用Cronbach's alpha对数据进行内部相关性(一致性)分析。 Cronbach的alpha记录为.834,表明对29个问题中的17个定标项具有很强的可靠性。;预测试的初步数据表明9/11事件对LEPC的功能没有统计学上的显着影响,但是确实导致与向公众发布敏感的危险化学信息有关的政策发生了重大的可衡量的变化。在广泛使用之前,有必要进一步验证和完善仪器。但是,收集到的信息是有价值的,因为它可以指导决策者了解当前立法,法规和政策的效力。它还可以通知他们是否需要修改法律,法规和/或政策,以确保符合原始法律(EPCRA)的意图。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liberty, Arthur A.;

  • 作者单位

    New Jersey City University.;

  • 授予单位 New Jersey City University.;
  • 学科 Social research.;Management.;Public administration.
  • 学位 D.Sc.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号