首页> 外文学位 >Iridescent, Distasteful, and Blue: Effectiveness of Short-Wavelength, Iridescent Coloration as a Warning Signal in the Pipevine Swallowtail Butterfly (Battus philenor).
【24h】

Iridescent, Distasteful, and Blue: Effectiveness of Short-Wavelength, Iridescent Coloration as a Warning Signal in the Pipevine Swallowtail Butterfly (Battus philenor).

机译:呈虹彩,有臭味和呈蓝色:短波状,虹彩着色作为Pipevine燕尾蝴蝶(Battus philenor)中的警告信号的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Warning coloration deters predators from attacking prey that are defended, usually by being distasteful, toxic, or otherwise costly for predators to pursue and consume. Predators may have an innate response to warning colors or learn to associate them with a defense through trial and error. In general, predators should select for warning signals that are easy to learn and recognize. Previous research demonstrates long-wavelength colors (e.g. red and yellow) are effective because they are readily detected and learned. However, a number of defended animals display short-wavelength coloration (e.g. blue and violet), such as the pipevine swallowtail butterfly (Battus philenor). The role of blue coloration in warning signals had not previously been explicitly tested. My research showed in laboratory experiments that curve-billed thrashers (Toxostoma curvirostre) and Gambel's quail ( Callipepla gambelii) can learn and recognize the iridescent blue of B. philenor as a warning signal and that it is innately avoided. I tested the attack rates of these colors in the field and blue was not as effective as orange. I concluded that blue colors may function as warning signals, but the effectiveness is likely dependent on the context and predator.;Blue colors are often iridescent in nature and the effect of iridescence on warning signal function was unknown. I reared B. philenor larvae under varied food deprivation treatments. Iridescent colors did not have more variation than pigment-based colors under these conditions; variation which could affect predator learning. Learning could also be affected by changes in appearance, as iridescent colors change in both hue and brightness as the angle of illuminating light and viewer change in relation to the color surface. Iridescent colors can also be much brighter than pigment-based colors and iridescent animals can statically display different hues. I tested these potential effects on warning signal learning by domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and found that variation due to the directionality of iridescence and a brighter warning signal did not influence learning. However, blue-violet was learned more readily than blue-green. These experiments revealed that the directionality of iridescent coloration does not likely negatively affect its potential effectiveness as a warning signal.
机译:警告色会阻止食肉动物攻击被保卫的猎物,通常是令人反感的,有毒的或其他使食肉动物追求和食用的代价高昂的动物。捕食者可能对警告色有先天的反应,或学会通过反复试验将它们与防御联系起来。通常,捕食者应选择易于学习和识别的警告信号。先前的研究表明长波长颜色(例如红色和黄色)是有效的,因为它们易于检测和学习。然而,许多被保护的动物表现出短波长的着色(例如蓝色和紫色)​​,例如牛尾燕尾蝴蝶(Battus philenor)。先前尚未明确测试蓝色在警告信号中的作用。我的研究在实验室实验中表明,弯曲嘴th(Toxostoma curvirostre)和Gambel鹌鹑(Callipepla gambelii)可以学习并识别出蓝眼睛的彩虹色作为警告信号,因此本来可以避免。我在野外测试了这些颜色的攻击率,蓝色的效果不如橙色。我得出的结论是,蓝色可能起到警告信号的作用,但有效性可能取决于上下文和捕食者。蓝色通常在本质上是虹彩的,并且虹彩对警告信号功能的影响尚不清楚。我在各种食物剥夺治疗下饲养了博爱小球藻的幼虫。在这些条件下,彩虹色的变化不多于基于颜料的颜色。可能影响捕食者学习的变异。学习也可能会受到外观变化的影响,因为随着照明光和观看者的角度相对于颜色表面的变化,虹彩颜色的色相和亮度都会发生变化。彩虹色的颜色也可以比基于颜料的颜色明亮得多,并且彩虹色的动物可以静态显示不同的色相。我测试了这些潜在影响对家鸡(Gallus gallus domesticus)预警信号的学习,发现由于虹彩的方向性和更明亮的预警信号而引起的变化不会影响学习。但是,蓝紫色比蓝绿色更容易学习。这些实验表明,虹彩着色的方向性可能不会对其警告信号的潜在有效性产生负面影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pegram, Kimberly Vann.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral Sciences.;Biology Entomology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 154 p.
  • 总页数 154
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号