首页> 外文学位 >Should the FDA make UVA protection mandatory in sunscreen products?: A systematic review.
【24h】

Should the FDA make UVA protection mandatory in sunscreen products?: A systematic review.

机译:FDA是否应该在防晒产品中强制采用UVA防护?:系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background It is generally believed that ultraviolet radiation is a risk factor of skin cancer. Many people know the conventional ways of protecting themselves from the sun, such as staying out of the sun, shielding clothing, and wearing sunscreen. Although, wearing sunscreen alone should not be considered sufficient protection, there are various reasons why some sunscreen products may be better than others. Broad Spectrum Skin Protection Factor (SPF) is an allover sunscreen that protects from both ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation. In the United States it is not required for sunscreens to be broad spectrum. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only requires sunscreens to protect from UVB rays. In the European Union (EU) there is a requirement to provide the consumer with a minimum level of one-third UVA protection in relation to the UVA protection factor. In this research, a systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate whether UVA protection should a mandatory requirement for sunscreen products.;Methods A systematic review of UVA protection in sunscreen was conducted and the following databases; PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched (date range: Jan 1998 to Jan 2015). The search terms included 'UVA', 'skin protection', and 'sunscreen'. The list of references cited in eligible manuscripts were also searched. From this search, studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria included publication types other than systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies; as well as laboratory studies. Articles were limited to those that included specific studies for testing sun protection factors against UVA and UVB rays. Exclusion criteria included any articles only assessing UVB exposure, new formulations and filters, and SPF testing methods.;Results Based upon the evaluation of current literature it has been shown that UVA protection resulted in; larger reductions in elastin promoter activity, protection against erythema, considered to be an effective treatment for relieving symptoms of photoaging, protection against immunosuppression and solar-simulated radiation (SSR) induced chalcone synthase (CHS), prevention of polymorphic light eruption (PLE) lesions, and protection for individuals at risk of melanoma.;Conclusion The conclusion drawn from this systematic review show that UVA protection should be required in all sunscreen products. Based on the studies conducted and the analysis of the literature it is evident that the benefits of UVA protection certainly outweigh the risks and should be approved for public health usage. This thesis also forms a basis for a better understanding of problems associated with UVA exposure. In addition it will also provide further knowledge on skin protection in sunscreen, and will provide for further review of FDA standards in regards to broad-spectrum protection in sunscreen products. This report also provides suggestions for areas for future research.
机译:背景技术通常认为紫外线辐射是皮肤癌的危险因素。许多人都知道保护自己免受日光照射的常规方法,例如避开阳光,穿防护服和戴防晒霜。尽管不应单独戴防晒霜,但应考虑到多种原因,有些防晒产品可能比其他防晒产品更好。广谱皮肤保护因子(SPF)是一种全面防晒霜,可防止紫外线A(UVA)和紫外线B(UVB)辐射。在美国,防晒霜不需要广谱。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)仅要求使用防晒霜来保护免受UVB射线的伤害。在欧盟(EU)中,相对于UVA保护因子,要求为消费者提供至少三分之一的UVA保护。在这项研究中,对文献进行了系统的综述,以评估UVA防护是否应作为防晒产品的强制性要求。方法对防晒产品中的UVA防护进行了系统综述,并建立了以下数据库:系统搜索了PubMed,ScienceDirect和Cochrane图书馆(日期范围:1998年1月至2015年1月)。搜索词包括“ UVA”,“皮肤保护”和“防晒霜”。还检索了合格手稿中引用的参考文献列表。通过此搜索,根据预定义的纳入和排除标准筛选了研究。纳入标准包括系统评价,荟萃分析,随机对照试验,队列研究和病例对照研究以外的出版物类型;以及实验室研究。文章仅限于那些包含针对UVA和UVB射线测试防晒系数的专门研究的文章。排除标准包括任何仅评估UVB暴露的文章,新配方和过滤器以及SPF测试方法。结果基于对现有文献的评估,结果表明UVA防护可导致紫外线辐射。弹性蛋白启动子活性的大幅度降低,针对红斑的保护,被认为是缓解光老化症状的有效方法,针对免疫抑制和太阳模拟辐射(SSR)诱导的查尔酮合酶(CHS)的保护,预防多态性光疹(PLE)病变结论总结从本系统综述得出的结论表明,所有防晒产品均需要UVA保护。根据进行的研究和文献分析,很明显,保护紫外线A的好处肯定大于风险,应该批准其用于公共卫生用途。本论文还为更好地了解与UVA暴露相关的问题奠定了基础。此外,它还将提供有关防晒产品中皮肤保护的更多知识,并将进一步审查FDA标准中有关防晒产品中的广谱保护方面的内容。该报告还为未来的研究领域提供了建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Talkovsky, Lori Faye.;

  • 作者单位

    Long Island University, The Brooklyn Center.;

  • 授予单位 Long Island University, The Brooklyn Center.;
  • 学科 Pharmaceutical sciences.;Aging.;Public health education.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 60 p.
  • 总页数 60
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号