首页> 外文学位 >Complicity in international criminal law: A fragmented law in need of a new approach.
【24h】

Complicity in international criminal law: A fragmented law in need of a new approach.

机译:国际刑法的共谋:需要零碎的法律,需要一种新的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the advent of the concept of complicity in international crimes in the years following the end of World War 2, the international jurisprudence has had difficulties in conclusively establishing the content of this concept. To that effect, the ICTY, ICTR, SCSL, STL, and the ICC's jurisprudence contain complicated, unresolved issues that need to be addressed in order to safeguard coherence in ICL. An example of the results of these issues is the discrepancy between the outcome in the cases of Charles Taylor and of Momcilo Perisic where, for essentially the same conduct, the former was convicted and sentenced to 50 years in prison while the latter was acquitted of all charges. In the current situation of on-going legitimacy deficit of international criminal law, this problem must be tackled efficiently. To do so, in this paper, I identified the issues of complicity in ICL and tried to find solutions for them through a proposed definition of the concept of complicity which could be incorporated in the statutes of international criminal tribunals or in the international jurisprudence. According to my proposition, an aid, assistance, or support that has a substantial effect on the commission of the crime by the perpetrator given while the accomplice knew or was wilfully blind that the crime was being committed or that the perpetrator wanted to commit the crime and that, in the normal course of events, it was almost inevitable that the crime would be committed would be the new legal standard for complicity in ICL. I argue that this definition would settle many grave problems currently afflicting complicity such as the lack of legal certainty and the discrepancies in the outcomes among ICL judgments. I conclude the thesis by observing that, given that we are at the outset of a new world order, the international community should take this opportunity to set out clearly the content of complicity, a concept which is likely to receive increasingly widespread application in the future.
机译:自从第二次世界大战结束后的几年中,国际罪行中共谋概念的出现以来,国际法学一直难以确定性地确立该概念的内容。为此,前南问题国际法庭,卢旺达问题国际法庭,南卡罗莱纳州立法院,STL和国际刑事法院的判例包含复杂而未解决的问题,必须加以解决,以维护ICL的一致性。这些问题的结果的一个例子是,在查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)和蒙西罗·佩里西奇(Momcilo Perisic)案件中的结果之间存在差异,在实质上相同的行为下,前者被定罪并判处50年监禁,而后者被无罪释放。收费。在当前国际刑法合法性持续不足的情况下,必须有效解决这一问题。为此,在本文中,我确定了ICL中的共谋问题,并试图通过对共谋概念的拟议定义找到解决方案,可以将其纳入国际刑事法庭规约或国际法学。根据我的主张,在犯罪者知道或故意不知道犯罪正在发生或犯罪者想实施犯罪的同时,提供了对犯罪者的犯罪有重大影响的援助,协助或支持而且,在正常情况下,几乎不可避免的是,犯罪将成为ICL共谋的新法律标准。我认为,此定义将解决当前困扰同谋的许多严重问题,例如缺乏法律确定性以及ICL判决结果之间的差异。最后,我认为,鉴于我们处于世界新秩序之初,国际社会应借此机会明确阐明同谋的内容,这一概念将来可能会越来越广泛地得到应用。 。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lamarre, Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 International law.
  • 学位 M.Laws
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 272 p.
  • 总页数 272
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号