首页> 外文学位 >Examining philosophical perspectives of Soka educators in liberal arts settings for value-creating professional development approaches.
【24h】

Examining philosophical perspectives of Soka educators in liberal arts settings for value-creating professional development approaches.

机译:在文科环境中研究创价教育者的哲学观点,以寻求创造专业发展方法的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The philosophical foundations of professional development in most educational disciplines shape the individual perspectives and commitments of practitioners. An emerging group of Soka (value-creating) educators has advanced in their discipline through self-directed professional development based on Soka education philosophy theorized by Tsunesaburo Makiguchi and actualized in Soka school systems by Daisaku Ikeda. How distinctive philosophical professional development approaches of Soka educators translate into measurable perspectives on teaching warrants examination. This study examined differences in philosophical perspectives of Soka and non-Soka faculty. The assumption was that distinctions in the professional development of Soka and non-Soka faculty reflect in their teaching philosophy. Using a three-phase framework (conceptualization, mentorship, and diversification) of philosophical professional development approaches, this study tested for differences in the teaching philosophy of Soka and non-Soka faculty. Pratt and Collins' Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI) measured teaching philosophies with standardized scales for five teaching perspectives (Transmission, Apprenticeship, Developmental, Nurturing, and Social Reform) and three commitments to teaching (Beliefs, Intentions, and Actions). Using a causal-comparative non-equivalent group post-test only design, convenience samples of 21 self-identified Soka faculty and 63 non-Soka faculty teaching liberal arts undergraduates in United States higher education institutions participated. While both perspective and commitment scores were higher for the Soka sample, ANOVA testing showed significantly stronger orientations toward Apprenticeship and Intention among Soka faculty. The level of education and years of career experience were also higher for Soka than non-Soka instructors, but not gender, workload, or discipline. This study provides the first reported empirical and quantitative evidence that Soka (value-creating) faculty have undergone previous professional development based on philosophical approaches of Soka education. These approaches theorized by Makiguchi and actualized by Ikeda share heightened Soka awareness, a significantly stronger Apprenticeship perspective and a higher Intention commitment to teaching. Together with a critical analysis of research literature, this study's findings and three-phase professionalization framework expand awareness about Soka approaches of mentorship, Ikeda's action theories of espoused humane teaching propositions, and commitment to teaching. Future research should probe the relationship between framework's professional development model and Pratt's teaching perspective and commitment model using quasi-experimental designs and larger samples.
机译:大多数教育学科中专业发展的哲学基础塑造着从业者的个人观点和承诺。一群新兴的创价(价值创造)教育者通过自身的专业发展取得了进步,他们的职业发展是基于Tsukasaburo Makiguchi提出的创价教育哲学,并由池田大作(Daisaku Ikeda)在创价学校系统中实现的。创价教育者独特的哲学专业发展方法是如何转化为对教学授权书考试的可衡量观点的。这项研究考察了创价和非创价教师的哲学观点的差异。假设是,创价学院和非创价学院教师在专业发展方面的差异体现在他们的教学理念上。本研究使用哲学专业发展方法的三个阶段框架(概念化,指导和多元化),测试了创价学院和非创价学院教师的教学哲学差异。普拉特和柯林斯的《教学观点清单》(TPI)用五个教学观点(传播,学徒,发展,育儿和社会改革)和三项教学承诺(信念,意图和行动)的标准化量表来衡量教学理念。使用因果比较的非等额小组仅测验后设计,参加了美国高等教育机构的21名自我确定的Soka教师和63名非Soka教师教学文科本科生的便利样本。虽然Soka样本的观点和承诺分数都较高,但ANOVA测试显示Soka教职员工对学徒和意向的取向明显更强。 Soka的教育水平和多年的职业经验也高于非Soka的讲师,但没有性别,工作量或纪律。这项研究提供了第一个报告的经验和定量证据,表明创价学院的教师已经根据创价教育的哲学方法经历了先前的职业发展。由Makiguchi理论化和由Ikeda实施的这些方法具有更高的Soka意识,明显更强的学徒观点以及对教学的更高意向承诺。结合对研究文献的批判性分析,本研究的发现和三阶段专业化框架扩大了人们对Soka指导方法,池田信奉人道主义教学主张的行动理论以及对教学的承诺的认识。未来的研究应该使用准实验设计和更大的样本来探究框架的专业发展模型与Pratt的教学观点和承诺模型之间的关系。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Teacher education.
  • 学位 D.Ed.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 267 p.
  • 总页数 267
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号