首页> 外文学位 >Whole-Earth consciousness in Maximus the confessor, Nicholas of Cusa, and Teilhard de Chardin: Seeds for a 21st century sacramental creation spirituality and ecological ethics.
【24h】

Whole-Earth consciousness in Maximus the confessor, Nicholas of Cusa, and Teilhard de Chardin: Seeds for a 21st century sacramental creation spirituality and ecological ethics.

机译:马克西姆斯(Maxus)的悔者,库萨(Cusa)的尼古拉斯(Nicholas)和蒂亚哈德·德查尔丁(Teilhard de Chardin)的全地球意识:21世纪圣礼创作精神和生态伦理学的种子。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last fifty years Western Christianity has been criticized as a cause and enabler of Earth's ecological crisis. This criticism is based on the conclusion that Christianity promotes a spiritual-material dualism and that the material side of life has little sacred value. It is also based on the observed hesitancy of many Christians to embrace modern scientific understandings of creation, especially evolution. Some Christian writers have responded by accepting modern cosmology and evolution, and advocating for a sacramental creation spirituality, oftentimes supported by fresh readings of earlier Christian writings.;This dissertation looks at Maximus the Confessor (c.580-662 CE), Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464 CE), and Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955 CE). Teilhard attests to an experience of natural sacrament in perceiving an increasingly transfigured creation, meaning the glory of God is ever more perceptible as a timely conscious insight into creation and as an emergent aspect of cosmogenesis and evolution moving toward Christ-Omega, the end and fulfillment of all creation. The teachings of Maximus readily support this sacramental view of creation by affirming a universal, ontological, and "real" presence of the Logos of God. A theological insight of Nicholas's doctrine of learned ignorance is that the Christian God always incarnates, transfigures, fulfills, and exceeds the entire cosmos. Together the teachings of Maximus and Nicholas support Teilhard's call for a theology of a Creator God robust enough to encompass the most expansive and complicated propositions about creation made by science, while remaining as close as the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.;The integrated teachings of these three figures suggest an ontological consecration of creation. This consecration inspires sacramental experiences of God in and through creation that complement the sacramental experience of Christ in the Eucharist. Over the evolutional time frame, these sacraments converge as one and the same sacrament at Christ-Omega. The complementary and ultimately convergent relationship between these sacramental experiences supports the ethical conclusion that just as one receives and responds to Christ present in the elements of the communion table, so one ought to receive and respond to oneself, one's neighbors, and all creation as the universal consecrated neighborhood.
机译:在过去的五十年中,西方基督教一直被批评为地球生态危机的起因和推动者。这种批评是基于这样的结论,即基督教促进了精神物质的二元论,而生命的物质方面几乎没有神圣的价值。它也基于许多基督徒对接受现代科学的理解,尤其是对进化的理解的犹豫。一些基督教作家的回应是接受现代宇宙论和进化论,并主张一种圣礼的创造灵性,而这往往得到早期基督教著作的新读本的支持。本论文研究的是Maxim悔者马克西姆斯(约公元580-662年),库萨的尼古拉斯(1401-1464 CE)和Teilhard de Chardin(1881-1955 CE)。蒂哈尔德证明了自然圣礼在感知越来越被变形的创造物方面的经验,这意味着上帝的荣耀作为对创造物的及时有意识的洞察力以及宇宙生成和进化向基督-欧米茄,终结与成就的崭露头角而变得更加可感知。所有的创作。马克西姆斯的教导通过肯定上帝圣言的普遍存在,本体论和“真实”存在,很容易地支持这种神圣的创造观。尼古拉斯学无知学说的神学见解是,基督教神总是化身,变形,实现并超越整个宇宙。马克西姆斯和尼古拉斯的教义一起支持泰勒哈德关于创造者神学的呼吁,该神学神学足够健壮,可以涵盖关于科学创造的最广泛和最复杂的命题,同时与圣体圣事中基督的真实存在保持密切的联系。这三个图的教导暗示了创造的本体论奉献。这种奉献激发了上帝在圣体中的圣礼体验,并通过创造补充了圣体圣事中基督的圣礼体验。在进化的时间框架内,这些圣礼在基督-欧米茄汇聚为同一圣餐。这些圣礼经验之间的互补和最终趋同的关系支持以下道德结论:正当人们接受和回应圣餐表中的基督时,一个人应该接受并回应自己,邻居和一切创造,普遍奉献的社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hastings, Stephen Lawrence.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Theology.;Spirituality.;Ethics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 266 p.
  • 总页数 266
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:05
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号