首页> 外文学位 >Constructing A Developmental Trajectory of Educational Neuroscience: Grounded Perspectives From Pioneers.
【24h】

Constructing A Developmental Trajectory of Educational Neuroscience: Grounded Perspectives From Pioneers.

机译:构建教育神经科学的发展轨迹:先驱的扎根观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study begins with video of the Cognitive Neuroscience and Education: Brain Mechanisms Underlying School Subjects conference held in 1995, hosted at the University of Oregon by Dr. Michael Posner and sponsored by the James S. McDonnell Foundation, that marked a beginning in how to discuss potential contributions from cognitive neuroscience to improve educational practice. It concludes with the modern perspectives and interpretations of some of those speakers. This study attempts to construct a developmental arc of the discipline of educational neuroscience according to these pioneering voices. The intermediate nineteen years involved an almost immeasurable amount of activity within the discipline, both in terms of progress and regression. This study used qualitative, constructivist grounded theory methods to articulate an interpretation of this activity. This study is framed---as the discipline is itself---in the fundamental conceptual, methodological, and practical obstacles that pose a potential hindrance to the efficacy of the field. The ebb and flow of the development of the field contextualize my interpretations of the perspectives from these primary sources. This investigation demonstrated the conference in 1995 to be an attempt by scientists from disparate fields of research to explore the potential for common ground. Further, the optimism present in 1995 continues today among many of the presenters, though their emphasis on caution despite progress is strong as well. Recommendations for continued progress are discussed as they emerged.
机译:这项研究从1995年举行的认知神经科学与教育:基础学科的大脑机制会议视频开始,该会议由俄勒冈大学迈克尔·波斯纳博士主持,詹姆斯·麦克唐纳基金会赞助,标志着如何讨论认知神经科学对改善教育实践的潜在贡献。本文以其中一些演讲者的现代观点和解释作为结尾。这项研究试图根据这些开创性的声音来构建教育神经科学学科的发展弧线。从进步和消退的角度来看,这十九年中期涉及该学科几乎不可估量的活动。这项研究使用了定性的,建构主义的理论方法来阐明这种活动。这项研究的框架是(因为学科本身就是这样)框架,而框架的基本概念,方法论和实践障碍构成了对该领域功效的潜在障碍。领域发展的潮起潮落使我从这些主要来源对观点的解释成为背景。这项调查表明,1995年的会议是来自不同研究领域的科学家的一次尝试,以探索达成共识的潜力。此外,尽管许多主持人尽管努力也很谨慎,但他们对1995年的乐观态度一直持续到今天。提出了有关持续进步的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gillmarten, Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    George Mason University.;

  • 授予单位 George Mason University.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.;Psychology Cognitive.;Biology Neuroscience.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 167 p.
  • 总页数 167
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号