首页> 外文学位 >A STUDY OF OKLAHOMA'S 'MANUFACTURERS' PRODUCTS LIABILITY DOCTRINE'.
【24h】

A STUDY OF OKLAHOMA'S 'MANUFACTURERS' PRODUCTS LIABILITY DOCTRINE'.

机译:俄克拉何马州“制造商的产品责任宣言”的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scope of Study. This study attempts to determine the effects of the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision in Kirkland v. General Motors and to explicate post Kirkland products liability case decisions primarily of Oklahoma origin. The major objectives of the study were: (1) to analyze existing products liability law as it exists on a national level and generally; (2) to analyze existing (and project therefrom) Manufacturers' Products Liability law as it exists in Oklahoma; and, (3) to present in one document a rationale for the significant appellate court opinions which have decided issues relating to the status of Manufacturers' Products Liability in this state. Relevant cases were analyzed to determine the role of expressed judicial intent and the protection afforded the user, bystander and consumer, as well as the duty established therein for business and industry. Consistencies and inconsistencies were examined in the judicial decisions regarding this emerging specialty of law.; Findings and Conclusions. The landmark decision handed down by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in 1974 in the Kirkland v. General Motors case created the Oklahoma products liability law, called by the court "Manufacturers' Products Liability." This Oklahoma law is essentially the Restatement (Second) of Torts, (SECTION)402 A version of strict liability in tort. However, Oklahoma's Manufacturers' Products Liability law has a more restrictive plaintiff's conduct defense. Although negligence and Manufacturers' Products Liability are both still available as causes of action, implied warranty has been merged into the new doctrine, except to the extent the Uniform Commercial Code applies, e.g., (SECTION)2-318. Kirkland extended strict liability to manufacturers, retailers, wholesalers, etc. of unreasonably dangerous products and later cases have extended strict tort liability to commercial lessors and bystanders. The Kirkland opinion held that the two year tort statute of limitations measured from the date of injury applies to Manufacturers' Products Liability.
机译:研究范围。这项研究试图确定俄克拉荷马州最高法院在Kirkland诉通用汽车案中的判决的影响,并阐明主要是俄克拉荷马州血统的Kirkland产品责任案判决。该研究的主要目标是:(1)分析现有的产品责任法,因为它在国家层面上普遍存在; (2)分析俄克拉荷马州现有的(及其项目)制造商产品责任法; (3)在一份文件中提出上诉法院重要意见的理由,这些意见已决定了与该州制造商产品责任的状况有关的问题。对相关案件进行了分析,以确定所表达的司法意图的作用以及为用户,旁观者和消费者提供的保护,以及其中为工商业确定的职责。在关于这一新兴法律专业的司法裁决中,研究了一致性和不一致之处。结论和结论。俄克拉荷马州最高法院于1974年在Kirkland诉通用汽车案中作出的具有里程碑意义的裁决制定​​了俄克拉荷马州产品责任法,该法被法院称为“制造商产品责任”。俄克拉荷马州法律实质上是《侵权行为重述(第二)》(第402条),是侵权行为中严格责任的一种形式。但是,俄克拉荷马州的《制造商产品责任法》对原告的行为进行了更为严格的抗辩。尽管过失和制造商的产品责任仍然可以作为起诉的原因,但隐含的担保已合并到新的准则中,除非统一商业法规适用,例如(SECTION)2-318。柯克兰(Kirkland)对不合理危险产品的制造商,零售商,批发商等扩大了严格责任,后来的案件也对商业出租人和旁观者扩大了严格侵权责任。柯克兰(Kirkland)的意见认为,从伤害发生之日起计算的两年侵权责任法适用于制造商的产品责任。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Education Business.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 68 p.
  • 总页数 68
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 F7-4;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号