首页> 外文学位 >COMPARISON OF LATERAL EYE MOVEMENT GROUPS ON PERFORMANCE OF CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION, NECKER CUBE REVERSALS, AND STROOP TEST.
【24h】

COMPARISON OF LATERAL EYE MOVEMENT GROUPS ON PERFORMANCE OF CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION, NECKER CUBE REVERSALS, AND STROOP TEST.

机译:侧向眼动组在关键FLICKER融合,NECKER CUBE逆转和增幅测试中的性能比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Problem. Lateral Eye Movements permit classification of individuals based on directional patterns of Lateral Eye Movements. It has been shown that the Lateral Eye Movement groups differ on a number of personality, cognitive, perceptual and physiological variables. Two major theoretical views have grown from the research, one that the Lateral Eye Movement relates to cortical functions, and one that it is related to subcortical function. The purpose of the study was to determine if the groups demonstrate significant differences regarding physiological, perceptual, and cognitive measures, thereby supporting one of the theoretical views.;Results. The results indicated that classification of individuals into Lateral Eye Movement groups was reliable. The Critical Flicker Fusion threshold for Right Movers was significantly higher than for Bidirectionals or Left Movers. Significantly lower Necker Cube Reversals were found for Left Movers than for either Bidirectionals or Right Movers. No significant difference was found on the Stroop Test for the Lateral Eye Movement groups. A significant difference was found between the performance of Males and Females on the Stroop Test. The results of this study support that the Lateral Eye Movements are related to subcortical functions.;Method. One hundred and five volunteers were classified as Right, Bidirectional, or Left Movers. Each subject participated in the three experimental conditions. Critical Flicker Fusion was determined by the psychophysical method of limits for ascending and descending trials. The Necker Cube Reversals consisted of four timed observation trials. The three-card Stroop Test consisted of a Word-, Color-, and Color-Word Card.
机译:问题。侧眼运动允许根据侧眼运动的方向模式对个人进行分类。研究表明,眼球外侧运动在个性,认知,知觉和生理变量方面存在差异。从研究中得出了两种主要的理论观点,一种是侧眼运动与皮层功能有关,另一种是其与皮层下功能有关。该研究的目的是确定各组在生理,知觉和认知测量方面是否表现出显着差异,从而支持其中一种理论观点。结果表明,将个人分为侧眼运动组是可靠的。右推动器的临界闪烁融合阈值明显高于双向或左推动器。与双向或右移动相比,左移动的Necker Cube反转显着降低。在Stroop测试中,侧眼运动组没有发现显着差异。在Stroop测试中,发现男性和女性的表现之间存在显着差异。这项研究的结果支持侧眼运动与皮层下功能有关。一百零五名志愿者被分为右,双向或左移动者。每个受试者都参加了三个实验条件。临界闪烁融合是通过心理物理方法确定上升和下降试验的极限。内克立方逆转包括四个定时的观察试验。三张卡片的Stroop测试由单词,颜色和单词单词卡组成。

著录项

  • 作者

    HAYES, DANIEL STANFORD.;

  • 作者单位

    United States International University.;

  • 授予单位 United States International University.;
  • 学科 Psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 112 p.
  • 总页数 112
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号