首页> 外文学位 >DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE RATING OF STEEL BRIDGE STRUCTURE UNDER AASHTO AND ARBITRARY VEHICULAR LOADINGS.
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE RATING OF STEEL BRIDGE STRUCTURE UNDER AASHTO AND ARBITRARY VEHICULAR LOADINGS.

机译:在AASHTO和任意车辆荷载下钢桥结构评级方法的发展与比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three methods are presented which can be used to provide an inventory and operating ratings for composite/noncomposite steel structures with a concrete deck. Two of the methods, the Working Stress Rating (WSR) and the Load Factor Rating (LFR) methods are codified within the AASHTO specifications. The Autostress Rating (ASR) method is proposed, fully developed and implemented, along with the WSR and LFR methods, in a computer program. All three methods are used to rate a series of 16 representative bridges where the results are compared and trends obtained. The correlations lead to predictions on how much each method can yield in a level of reserve strength in order to accommodate the overload vehicles which regularly traverse the bridges nationwide.
机译:提出了三种方法,可用于提供带有混凝土甲板的复合/非复合钢结构的清单和运行等级。两种方法,即工作应力额定值(WSR)和负载系数额定值(LFR)方法已编入AASHTO规范。自动压力评定(ASR)方法与WSR和LFR方法一起在计算机程序中提出,完全开发和实施。所有这三种方法都用于对一系列16个具有代表性的桥梁进行评分,在其中比较结果并获得趋势。相关性导致对每种方法在储备强度水平上可以屈服多少的预测,以便容纳经常在全国范围内穿越桥梁的超载车辆。

著录项

  • 作者

    FU, CHUNG CHI.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 352 p.
  • 总页数 352
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号