首页> 外文学位 >THE CONTRIBUTION OF SELECTED VARIABLES TO THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITIES OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN A FOUR YEAR BACCALAUREATE ACCREDITED PROGRAM IN NURSING.
【24h】

THE CONTRIBUTION OF SELECTED VARIABLES TO THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITIES OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN A FOUR YEAR BACCALAUREATE ACCREDITED PROGRAM IN NURSING.

机译:所选变量对四年制护理学士学位认可计划中所培养学生的重要思维能力的贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This correlational study was conducted to determine which of eight selected variables contributed most strongly to student nurses' ability to think critically. Multiple regression analysis was utilized to examine the intercorrelations between the criterion variable, total score on the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, and the predictor variables: SAT Verbal score; SAT Quantitative score; grade point average; age; and total number of credit hours in the natural science, behavioral/social sciences, arts and humanities and professional nursing courses required in a four-year baccalaureate nursing program.;From the derivation group of subjects, N = 81, the SAT Quantitative score, total number of credit hours in the arts and humanities and grade point average contributed 38 percent of the variance on critical thinking. Analysis of the cross-validation group, N = 69, revealed that the best set of predictor variables (SAT Quantitative score, total number of credit hours in the arts and humanities and grade point average) accounted for only 11 percent of the variance. The large amount of shrinkage considerably reduced the predictive accuracy of the regression equation.;It was concluded that for the sample in this study, critical thinking abilities are best correlated with variables like academic aptitude, as measured by scholastic achievement tests, academic experience, as measured by number of credit hours completed, and quality of academic performance, as measured by grade point average.;A later multiple regression analysis examined data from the combined undergraduate and incoming freshman group of subjects, N = 190. Of the four predictor variables examined, the SAT Quantitative score contributed the greatest amount of variance, 17 percent; whereas grade point average accounted for 4 percent, age accounted for 3.9 percent and the SAT Verbal score accounted for 2 percent of the variance on the critical thinking scores.;Findings from the initial analysis, N = 150 subjects, indicated that the SAT Quantitative score, total number of credit hours in the arts and humanities and grade point average contributed most strongly to the criterion variable, accounting for 24 percent of the variance.
机译:进行了这项相关性研究,以确定八个所选变量中的哪个对学生护士的批判性思考能力贡献最大。多元回归分析用于检验标准变量,Watson-Glaser批判性思维评估的总分与预测变量之间的相互关系。 SAT定量分数;平均绩点;年龄;以及四年制学士学位护理课程所要求的自然科学,行为/社会科学,艺术和人文学科以及专业护理课程的学时总数;从派生组中,N = 81,SAT定量得分,艺术和人文学科的总学时数和平均绩点占批判性思维差异的38%。对交叉验证组(N = 69)的分析显示,最佳的预测变量集(SAT定量得分,艺术和人文学科的学时总数和平均成绩)仅占变异的11%。大量的收缩大大降低了回归方程的预测准确性。结论是,对于本研究的样本,批判性思维能力与诸如学业能力等变量之间的相关性最好,如学业成绩测验,学术经验,通过完成学分的数量来衡量,并通过平均绩点来衡量学业成绩的质量。;后来的多元回归分析研究了本科生和新生的组合科目数据,N =190。在四个预测变量中,SAT定量得分的变化最大,为17%;而平均分数占4%,年龄占3.9%,SAT言语得分占批判性思维得分方差的2%。;初步分析发现,N = 150名受试者,表明SAT定量得分,艺术和人文科目的学时总数和平均成绩对标准变量的贡献最大,占差异的24%。

著录项

  • 作者

    TIESSEN, JOAN CAROLYN.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Educat.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 131 p.
  • 总页数 131
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号