首页> 外文学位 >FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION BY STREAM NETWORK CONTROL.
【24h】

FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION BY STREAM NETWORK CONTROL.

机译:通过流网络控制减少洪灾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the past, flood protection programs concentrated on structural measures such as dams and reservoirs. In 1979, the U.S. Water Resources Council revised the "Principles and Standards" that changed the basic structure of the planning process to insure the preparation and display of a "primary nonstructural plan". While this is only a guideline, it shows the increase in interest in nonstructural water measures.This research concentrates on minimizing the cost of flood damage reduction measures, both structural and nonstructural, and on environmental quality problems based on sediment control criteria as an indicator of environmental quality. The scope is limited to plan formulation with the objective of flood damage reduction by utilizing two criteria: total cost and erosion control effectiveness.In finding the optimum mix of flood damage reduction measures, reservoirs were chosen to represent structural measures watershed management was chosen to represent nonstructural measures.Two sets of reservoirs were used in this research: the first was at every stream order junction, and the second was at points immediately upstream from the flood areas. Four cases of sediment control practices were used for watershed management.The acceleration of population growth, urbanization, and industrial expansion which began in the 1940s caused dramatic increases in environmental problems. Quality control became the most important feature of water resources management during the 1970s.The results show that after applying watershed management above the reservoirs, both sets of reservoirs were able to limit peak discharge at flood damage areas to less than channel maximum carrying capacity and the reservoir cost reductions was a function of land use changes.All four cases of sediment control practices can reduce sediment loads drastically. The percentage of reduction depends upon the practices and land use changes. Even though there are a lot of controversy about soil conservation and tillage practices. The cost of sediment control practices varied according to the practices used.The significance of the research is a demonstration of how multiobjective planning techniques can be combined with computer-based analysis to generate cost-effective flood control strategies that are environmentally responsible.
机译:过去,防洪计划主要集中在水坝和水库等结构措施上。 1979年,美国水资源委员会修订了“原则和标准”,从而改变了规划过程的基本结构,以确保准备和展示“主要的非结构性计划”。尽管这仅是一个指南,但它表明人们对非结构性水措施的兴趣有所增加。本研究的重点是最大程度地减少结构性和非结构性洪水减灾措施的成本,以及基于沉积物控制标准作为指标的环境质量问题环境质量。该范围仅限于以减少总洪灾损失和控制侵蚀的两个标准为目标,以减少洪灾损失为目的制定计划。在寻找减少洪灾损失措施的最佳组合时,选择水库来代表结构措施,并选择流域管理来代表在这项研究中使用了两组水库:第一组是在每个河水阶交汇处,第二组是在洪水区上游的点。在流域管理中使用了4个沉积物控制措施案例.1940年代开始的人口增长,城市化和工业扩张加速导致环境问题急剧增加。质量控制已成为1970年代水资源管理的最重要特征。结果表明,在水库上方应用分水岭管理后,两套水库都能够将洪灾区的洪峰流量限制在小于航道最大承载能力的范围内。水库成本的减少是土地利用变化的函数。所有四种控制泥沙的方法都可以大幅度减少泥沙的负荷。减少的百分比取决于实践和土地用途的变化。即使在土壤保护和耕作实践方面存在很多争议。沉积物控制措施的成本因使用的方法而异。该研究的意义在于证明如何将多目标规划技术与基于计算机的分析相结合,以产生对环境负责的具有成本效益的防洪战略。

著录项

  • 作者

    SRIBURI, THAVIVONGSE.;

  • 作者单位

    Colorado State University.;

  • 授予单位 Colorado State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 233 p.
  • 总页数 233
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号