首页> 外文学位 >NORMATIVE CONSENSUS IN JUDGMENTS OF PRISON SENTENCES: POPULAR AND SELECTED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM PERCEPTIONS OF FAIR PUNISHMENTS FOR CONVICTED OFFENDERS (GENDER, RACE).
【24h】

NORMATIVE CONSENSUS IN JUDGMENTS OF PRISON SENTENCES: POPULAR AND SELECTED CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM PERCEPTIONS OF FAIR PUNISHMENTS FOR CONVICTED OFFENDERS (GENDER, RACE).

机译:判刑判决中的规范共识:对定罪者(性别,种族)的公平和公正的刑事司法制度选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study is to investigate empirically the extent of consensus in normative systems for punishing convicted offenders.; A factorial survey design was used to elicit either 25 or 50 distinct harshness ratings of prison terms given out hypothetically to convicted felons from more than 1,400 respondents. A block quota sample of Boston SMSA households and convenience samples of police, law students, and state prison inmates were interviewed.; The general population respondent sample is segmented into gender by race groups for analysis. Proximity to crime and subjective experiences with crime vary by race and gender and may account for differences observed in judgments of prison sentences.; Four indicators of judgment agreement derived from multiple regression models are used to investigate the extent of normative consensus found within the general population and across three selected groups of criminal justice system respondents. In general, these indicators suggest dissensus between the races that may be attributable to perceptions of injustice among blacks. More importantly, these indicators uncover more judgment disagreements between black men and black women than between blacks and whites, suggesting that structured differences in crime related experiences account for perceptions of fair punishments for convicted offenders.; An investigation of judgments made by criminal justice system respondent groups shows prisoners dissent from the view shared by police and law students of who should get what prison sentence. State prison inmates are strongly influenced by the offender's personal attributes when forming judgments of fair punishments.; Overall, the empirical analysis of judgments of prison sentences suggests that whites in the general population, police, and law students share the view that the just deserts principle for criminal sentencing can achieve justice. Blacks and state prison inmates share the view that an individualized justice model for sentencing can achieve fair systems for punishing offenders. Proximity to the crime problem and minority group status in the U.S. are suggested as two possible explanations for dissenting judgments of normative systems for distributing punishment.
机译:这项研究的目的是从经验上调查在规范系统中对被定罪的罪犯进行惩罚的共识程度。析因调查设计被用来对25个或50个不同的监狱条件严苛等级进行假设性假设,这些等级假设是从1,400多名受访者中被定罪的重罪。采访了波士顿SMSA家庭的全部配额样本以及警察,法学院学生和州监狱囚犯的便利样本。将一般人群的受访者样本按种族划分为性别,以进行分析。靠近犯罪和犯罪的主观经历因种族和性别而异,并且可以解释在判刑时观察到的差异。来自多个回归模型的四个判断一致性指标用于调查在一般人群中以及在三个选定的刑事司法系统受访者群体中发现的规范共识的程度。通常,这些指标表明种族之间存在分歧,这可能归因于黑人之间的不公正观念。更重要的是,这些指标揭示了黑人和黑人妇女之间的判决分歧比黑人和白人之间更多的判决分歧,这表明与犯罪有关的经验中的结构性差异说明了对定罪罪犯的公正惩罚。刑事司法系统受访者团体的判决调查显示,从警察和法系学生对谁应该受到什么样的徒刑的观点来看,囚犯持不同意见。州立监狱的犯人在做出公正惩罚的判决时会受到罪犯个人属性的强烈影响。总体而言,对判刑判决的实证分析表明,普通人群,警察和法学专业学生中的白人都同意这样一种观点,即公正的刑事判决原则可以实现正义。黑人和州监狱的囚犯都认为,量刑的个性化司法模式可以实现公平的惩罚罪犯的制度。建议在美国接近犯罪问题和少数群体地位,作为对分配惩罚性规范制度的不同判断的两种可能的解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    MILLER, JOANN LANGLEY.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 323 p.
  • 总页数 323
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法学各部门;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号