首页> 外文学位 >A model comparing drug utilization and pharmaceutical expenditures in community and mail-order pharmacy in a retiree population.
【24h】

A model comparing drug utilization and pharmaceutical expenditures in community and mail-order pharmacy in a retiree population.

机译:比较退休人员社区和邮购药房中药物利用和药物支出的模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Pharmaceutical products are distributed through several distribution channels such as retail, hospital, and mail order. Cost containment is the major impetus driving the development of mail order pharmacy. However, currently available empirical evidence that does not support the substitution of community pharmacy by mail order services to reduce overall drug expenditures.;The objective of this study was to compare drug utilization and pharmaceutical expenditures by simulating the effects of community pharmacy on drug utilization for a retiree patient population using mail order pharmacy. The data used for the analysis were pharmacy claims data for the period January 2000-September 2005. Drug claims for each patient were aggregated into courses of drug therapy (CDTs) representing unique patient IDs and unique drug products. Utilization differences between community and mail-order pharmacy were assumed to occur only at the last claim for each CDT. The simulation model employed to estimate the difference in drug utilization using mail-order pharmacy claims data assumed that discontinuation in community pharmacy would follow a random pattern.;A comparison basket of products with at least one claim in both community and mail-order pharmacy during each year from 2000-2005 were selected. Unit costs and expenditures for the medications in the basket were compared across community and mail-order pharmacy.;Seventy two and a half percent of the CDTs dispensed were intended for maintenance therapy and maintenance therapy was more concentrated in mail-order pharmacy as compared to community pharmacy. The use of mail-order pharmacy services resulted in an increase in drug utilization of 2.96% over community pharmacy and a reduction in pharmaceutical expenditures by 10.0-13.0% from 2000-2005. The unit total gross costs in community pharmacy were higher for about half of all products in the comparison basket of products.;The differences in pharmaceutical expenditures between community and mail-order pharmacy were explained by differences in acquisition costs, dispensing fees, and administrative costs. Rebates were not included in the analysis. Decision makers should carefully evaluate the utilization and cost effects that could result from the implementation of mail-order pharmacy programs.
机译:药品通过零售,医院和邮购等几种分销渠道进行分销。成本控制是推动邮购药房发展的主要动力。但是,目前可用的经验证据不支持通过邮购服务来替代社区药房以减少总体药物支出。本研究的目的是通过模拟社区药房对药物利用的影响来比较药物利用和药物支出。使用邮购药房的退休人员人群。用于分析的数据是2000年1月至2005年9月期间的药房索赔数据。每个患者的药物索赔都汇总到代表独特患者ID和独特药物产品的药物治疗(CDT)过程中。假定社区和邮购药房之间的利用率差异仅在每个CDT的最后一次索赔时才发生。使用邮购药房索赔数据估算药物利用差异的模拟模型假设社区药房停产将遵循随机模式;在此期间,在社区和邮购药房中至少有一项索赔的产品比较篮子从2000-2005年每年选择。比较了社区药店和邮购药房中一揽子药品的单位成本和支出。;分配的CDT的百分之二十二和一半是用于维持疗法的,而与之相比,维持疗法更多地集中在邮购药店。社区药房。与2000年至2005年相比,使用邮购药房服务使药物使用率比社区药房增加了2.96%,药品支出减少了10.0-13.0%。在产品比较一篮子中,社区药房的单位总费用高于所有产品的一半。社区药店和邮购药房之间药品支出的差异是由购置成本,配药费和管理成本的差异来解释的。回扣不包括在分析中。决策者应仔细评估实施邮购药房计划可能产生的利用率和成本影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Visaria, Jay Laxmichand.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 357 p.
  • 总页数 357
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药剂学;预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号