首页> 外文学位 >USE OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN ACCOUNTING APPLICATIONS: EVALUATION AND ILLUSTRATION BY PROSPECTIVE HOSPITAL REIMBURSEMENT.
【24h】

USE OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN ACCOUNTING APPLICATIONS: EVALUATION AND ILLUSTRATION BY PROSPECTIVE HOSPITAL REIMBURSEMENT.

机译:数据包络分析在会计应用中的使用:通过预期的医院报销进行评估和说明。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When called on to participate in evaluation of the effects of public sector programs, accountants must apply the standards of their profession to assess the usefulness of data sources and methods. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been used to evaluate the efficiency effects of programs. Before relying on its results, it is necessary to investigate its properties as an efficiency measurement method. Important measurement criteria such as reliability and validity cannot be directly assessed in real applications. Some evidence, however, may be obtained by examining solution consistency and comparability.; The interest of this research was in analytical and empirical evaluation of DEA group efficiency determinations. First, the DEA model and past literature were reviewed, to evaluate how group decisions can be made with DEA. Problems of amalgamating information across variables and firms were shown to complicate group efficiency comparisons.; DEA solutions in one empirical context (prospective hospital reimbursement) were subjected to consistency comparisons in several ways. First, two methods of group solutions were compared. The interenvelope method was shown to be less stable over a six-year period than a single-step approach. DEA solutions over the same period, using highly correlated alternative variable sets, were found to be different in many instances. For comparison, group judgements were made using standard methods (regression and ratio analysis). As expected, when patterns could be discerned in DEA solutions, they did not generally correspond to findings of those methods.; It was concluded that further work in DEA should improve group comparison methods, and demonstrate means to obtain consistent solutions. Defending any one efficiency conclusion for hospital reimbursement given DEA solutions developed here would be difficult indeed.
机译:当要求会计师参与评估公共部门计划的效果时,会计师必须运用其专业标准来评估数据源和方法的有用性。数据包络分析(DEA)已用于评估程序的效率效果。在依靠其结果之前,有必要研究其性能,作为一种效率测量方法。重要的测量标准(例如可靠性和有效性)无法在实际应用中直接评估。但是,可以通过检查解决方案的一致性和可比性来获得一些证据。这项研究的兴趣是对DEA组效率确定的分析和经验评估。首先,回顾了DEA模型和​​过去的文献,以评估如何使用DEA做出群体决策。跨变量和公司的信息融合问题被证明使小组效率的比较复杂化。在一种经验背景下(预期的医院报销)对DEA解决方案进行了几种方式的一致性比较。首先,比较了两种组解方法。结果表明,与单步方法相比,跨包方法在六年内的稳定性较差。发现在许多情况下,使用高度相关的替代变量集的同期DEA解决方案是不同的。为了进行比较,使用标准方法(回归和比率分析)进行小组判断。不出所料,当可以在DEA解决方案中识别出模式时,它们通常并不对应于这些方法的发现。结论是,DEA中的进一步工作应改进组比较方法,并展示获得一致解决方案的方法。鉴于在此开发的DEA解决方案,很难为医院报销的任何效率结论辩护,这确实很困难。

著录项

  • 作者

    BEDARD, JEAN CATHERINE.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号