首页> 外文学位 >BRITISH POLICY IN THE WAR OF THE PACIFIC: CHILE VS. PERU AND BOLIVIA, 1879-1884. A CHAPTER OF FREE TRADE EXPANSION IN THE PAX BRITANNICA PERIOD (IMPERIALISM, PERIPHERY, BOURGEOISIE, INDEBTEDNESS).
【24h】

BRITISH POLICY IN THE WAR OF THE PACIFIC: CHILE VS. PERU AND BOLIVIA, 1879-1884. A CHAPTER OF FREE TRADE EXPANSION IN THE PAX BRITANNICA PERIOD (IMPERIALISM, PERIPHERY, BOURGEOISIE, INDEBTEDNESS).

机译:太平洋战争中的英国政策:智利vs。秘鲁和玻利维亚,1879-1884年。 PAX布里坦尼察时期的自由贸易篇章(帝国主义,外围国家,布尔格瓦伊西大学,无负债)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Between 1879 and 1883 Peru and Bolivia were allied against Chile to fight the War of the Pacific. Peruvians and Bolivians have asserted that Great Britain supported Chile in the war. Those assertions found support in the then-Secretary of State of the United States James Blaine who labelled the conflict "an English war." British and Chileans have tended to deny the importance of Great Britain's role in the war. While conceding, up to a point, that significant economic ties existed between Chilean leaders and British capitalists with interests in the region, they cite a lack of evidence regarding the role of the British State in the conflict.;My working hypothesis was the following: in the War of the Pacific, the British and Chilean defense of Free Trade transformed them into allies, sharing the same interests, against a Peru that had opted for State monopoly as the main tool in reorganizing its economy.;If such an alliance did indeed exist, the fact that it was never sealed through a formal agreement made its existence difficult to verify. To establish whether Britain did take an active role in the war against Peruvian (and Bolivian) interests, how the British State took part in the conflict, the question of how private British interests were involved, and how they fared as a result of the war's outcome were investigated. The position of the British press regarding the war was also explored and evidence was uncovered reinforcing the thesis concerning an "informal" British-Chilean alliance.;The goal of this dissertation was to clarify the uncertainty surrounding the activities of the British during this war. I did so by carrying out research on a variety of primary sources, and by situating British-Chilean and British-Peruvian relations within the broader context of the English policy of the time. Special attention was paid to British efforts, in the Pax Britannica period, to promote Free Trade throughout the world, and particularly in the peripheral countries.
机译:在1879年和1883年之间,秘鲁和玻利维亚同智利抗衡太平洋战争。秘鲁人和玻利维亚人断言英国在战争中支持智利。这些主张在当时的美国国务卿詹姆斯·布莱恩(James Blaine)的支持下得到了支持,后者将冲突称为“英国战争”。英国和智利人倾向于否认英国在战争中的作用。尽管在某种程度上承认智利领导人与在该地区有利益的英国资本家之间存在着重要的经济联系,但他们援引了关于英国在冲突中的作用的证据不足;我的工作假设如下:在太平洋战争中,英国和智利的自由贸易防御使他们变成了拥有相同利益的同盟国,对抗了一个选择国家垄断作为其经济重组的主要工具的秘鲁。存在,但从未通过正式协议将其密封,这一事实使它的存在难以验证。为了确定英国是否确实在针对秘鲁(和玻利维亚)利益的战争中发挥了积极作用,不列颠国家如何参与冲突,英国私人利益如何参与其中以及战争带来的后果如何的问题结果进行了调查。还探讨了英国媒体对战争的立场,并发现了证据,以加强有关“非正式”的英智联盟的论点。本论文的目的是澄清这场战争期间围绕英国活动的不确定性。我这样做是通过对各种主要来源进行研究,并在当时英国政策的更广泛范围内确定了英吉关系和英秘鲁关系。在英国大不列颠时期,英国特别重视在全世界,特别是在周边国家促进自由贸易的努力。

著录项

  • 作者

    AMAYO-ZEVALLOS, ENRIQUE.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 History Latin American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 373 p.
  • 总页数 373
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:09
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号