首页> 外文学位 >ALIENATION AND LABOR IN THE THOUGHT OF KARL MARX, MAX WEBER, AND HANNAH ARENDT (GERMANY).
【24h】

ALIENATION AND LABOR IN THE THOUGHT OF KARL MARX, MAX WEBER, AND HANNAH ARENDT (GERMANY).

机译:卡尔·马克思,马克斯·韦伯和汉娜·阿伦特(德国)的思想中的异化和劳动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In an effort to discover the implications of their views regarding the desirability and possibility of overcoming alienation in modern society, a study of alienation and labor in the thought of Karl Marx (1818-1883), Max Weber (1864-1920), and Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) was carried out. It was argued that, while the term "alienation" is broad and has become a catchword for many ills of modern society, it offers a special form of insight into a wide range of problems and is still useful in a critique of modernity. Alienation is not just a general, abstract concept, but denotes definite, concrete conditions of existence for human beings. The young Marx and Arendt made extensive use of the term. Weber did not; however, it was shown that his writings have an affinity with those of Marx and Arendt which can best be described by the concept. The similarities as well as the differences among the views of the three thinkers were explicated, and the failings of each were also pointed out. The study demonstrated that Marx contributes much of value regarding alienation in the economic sphere. And, while Arendt's concept of world alienation is useful in understanding totalitarian domination, her ideas about the relationship of religion and sociology to alienation, as well as alienation with the economic sphere itself, are not as useful as those of Marx and Weber. Even though he does not adequately deal with the possibility of totalitarian abuses of power, the study maintained that Weber's discussion of politics is the most useful of the three.;It was concluded that, in order to understand alienation in modern society, one must use the insights of all three thinkers: Marx, regarding the domination and superfluity of workers engendered by the capitalist mode of production; Weber, regarding the alienating consequences of the "disenchantment of the world" and the rationalization process, bureaucratic domination, the consequences of the loss of economic status, and the necessity for politics; and Arendt, regarding world alienation and totalitarian domination.
机译:为了发现他们的观点对现代社会中消除异化的可取性和可能性的暗示,对卡尔·马克思(1818-1883),马克斯·韦伯(1864-1920)和汉娜的思想中的异化和劳动进行了研究。阿伦特(1906-1975)进行了。有人认为,尽管“异化”一词是广泛的,并已成为现代社会许多弊病的流行语,但它提供了对广泛问题的一种特殊见解,并在现代性批评中仍然有用。异化不仅是一个普遍的抽象概念,而且还表示人类存在的确定的,具体的生存条件。年轻的马克思和阿伦特广泛使用了这个词。韦伯没有;然而,事实证明,他的著作与马克思和阿伦特的著作具有相似性,可以用这个概念来最好地描述。阐述了三位思想家观点的异同,并指出了每位思想家的失败之处。研究表明,马克思在经济领域的疏远方面贡献了很多价值。而且,尽管阿伦特的世界异化概念对于理解极权统治是有用的,但她关于宗教和社会学与异化的关系以及与经济领域本身的异化的思想却没有马克思和韦伯的思想有用。即使他没有充分处理极权主义滥用权力的可能性,该研究仍认为韦伯对政治的讨论是这三种中最有用的;得出的结论是,为了理解现代社会中的疏远,必须使用这三个思想家的见解:马克思,关于资本主义生产方式产生的工人的统治和多余;韦伯谈到“世界的瓦解”和合理化进程,官僚统治,经济地位丧失的后果以及政治必要性的疏远后果;关于世界疏离和极权统治的问题,还有阿伦特。

著录项

  • 作者

    DECOSMO, JANET LEE.;

  • 作者单位

    The Florida State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Florida State University.;
  • 学科 History Modern.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 478 p.
  • 总页数 478
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号