首页> 外文学位 >Origins of the Eighteenth Amendment: The prohibition movement in the federal system, 1880-1920
【24h】

Origins of the Eighteenth Amendment: The prohibition movement in the federal system, 1880-1920

机译:第十八修正案的由来:联邦系统中的禁运运动,1880-1920年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Building on the recent renaissance in the study of temperance this dissertation shows how the federal system molded the prohibition movement. The federal government's regulation of commerce and the federal tax structure hindered the operation of state and local prohibition. In the 1880s and 1890s the predominate temperance ideology generated a Mosaic view of law that failed to provide practical solutions to the problems posed by the federal system. But by the time of national prohibition drys had changed their approach to legal issues. The legal environment pushed prohibitionists into adopting the idea of joint state and federal action against liquor. From the 1890s temperance advocates struggled to make the federal commerce power aid dry states. Before national prohibition, a series of federal statutes, the Wilson Act (1890), and COD Act (1909), the Webb-Kenyon Act (1913), and the Reed Bone Dry Amendment to the Postal Act (1917) fully mobilized that power for the dry cause. The rise of the Anti-Saloon league, with its pragmatic view of law, transformed the legal strategy of the prohibitionists. For example, dry plans for the federal liquor tax changed. Prohibitionists ceased to work for its abolition and instead successfully strove to turn it into a valuable liquor law enforcement weapon. Yet prohibitionists never gave up the idea of law as a moral statement. The drys, through the eighteenth amendment's concurrent powers clause and the Volstead Act's provisions, wrote these conceptions of law into the nation's Constitution and statutes.
机译:本文在对节制研究的最新复兴的基础上,展示了联邦系统如何塑造禁运运动。联邦政府的商业法规和联邦税收结构阻碍了州和地方禁令的实施。在1880年代和1890年代,主要的节制意识形态产生了马赛克的法律观点,未能为联邦制度带来的问题提供切实可行的解决方案。但是到了国家禁止之时,干法改变了他们对法律问题的处理方式。法律环境迫使禁酒主义者采用州和联邦对酒类采取联合行动的想法。从1890年代开始,节制主义者一直在努力使联邦商业力量援助干旱国家。在国家禁止之前,一系列联邦法规,《威尔逊法》(1890年)和《化学需氧量法》(1909年),《韦伯-肯尼恩法》(1913年)以及《邮政法》对芦苇骨干修订案(1917年)充分动员了该权力。对于干燥的原因。反沙龙联盟的兴起,以其务实的法律观点,改变了禁酒主义者的法律策略。例如,改变了联邦酒类税收的干燥计划。禁酒主义者不再为废除它而努力,而是成功地努力将其变成有价值的酒类执法武器。然而,禁止主义者从未放弃过将法律视为道德声明的想法。通过第18条修正案的同时行使权力条款和《沃尔斯特德法案》的规定,议员们将这些法律概念写入了该国的宪法和法规。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hamm, Richard Francis.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 American history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码 553 p.
  • 总页数 553
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号