首页> 外文学位 >An assessment of the impact of grouped item prompts versus single item prompts for human computer interface design.
【24h】

An assessment of the impact of grouped item prompts versus single item prompts for human computer interface design.

机译:对人机界面设计的分组项目提示和单个项目提示的影响进行评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Current research in screen design for human computer interaction has demonstrated that user task performance is influenced by placement, prompting methodology, and screen complexity. To assess the difference between a grouped item screen prompt and a series of single item screen prompts, a field experiment in a semiconductor manufacturing facility was designed. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups to use a data entry system. Seven of the screen prompts differed between the two groups. During the four weeks of the study, a significant difference was measured between groups. The group screen users had lower task times for all four weeks. No significant correlation exists between work experience, performance review scores, or designated work shift. A strong negative correlation exists between frequency of system usage and task time. No difference was noted for measured errors. Subjective scores significantly favored the group screen design.
机译:用于人机交互的屏幕设计的最新研究表明,用户任务性能受放置,提示方法和屏幕复杂度的影响。为了评估分组项目屏幕提示和一系列单个项目屏幕提示之间的差异,设计了半导体制造工厂中的现场实验。将受试者随机分配到两组中的一组,以使用数据输入系统。两组中的七个屏幕提示有所不同。在研究的四个星期中,两组之间存在显着差异。小组屏幕用户在所有四个星期中的任务时间都较短。工作经验,绩效考核分数或指定的工作班次之间不存在显着相关性。系统使用频率和任务时间之间存在很强的负相关性。所测量的误差没有差异。主观分数明显偏爱小组屏幕设计。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilson, Rory Howard.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.; Computer Science.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 105 p.
  • 总页数 105
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;自动化技术、计算机技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号