首页> 外文学位 >Control charts as decision aids to operational auditors' assessments of production process performance.
【24h】

Control charts as decision aids to operational auditors' assessments of production process performance.

机译:控制图可作为决策依据,帮助运营审核员评估生产过程的绩效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The principal objective of this study is to investigate the potential value of control charts, as decision aids, to one important aspect of operational auditors' production efficiency evaluations: assessments of production process stability based on analyses of output/input ratios and related measures of performance. Two subject groups evaluated the stability of hypothetical production processes based on analyses of efficiency measurement data presented in tabular and graphical formats. The graphs presented to the second subject group were supplemented with center lines and control limits and brief descriptions of what these lines represented. In addition to comparing the decision accuracy of the two subject groups, the researcher compared the decision accuracy of each group to (1) a benchmark equal to random accuracy, and (2) the decision accuracy of statistical process control (SPC) models. Decision accuracy was measured relative to "true" process states as modeled using computer simulation. The average decision confidence levels of the two subject groups were also compared.;The researcher concludes that inexperienced auditors (as represented by experienced auditing students in this experiment), with no SPC training, can not consistently make correct stability assessments at rates higher than expected by chance when their assessments are based solely on visual analyses of efficiency measurement data presented in tabular and graphical formats. Furthermore, estimates of process average and spread, without interpretation of how this incremental information is used in making stability assessments, do not contribute significantly to the accuracy of, or the confidence in, such decisions. Except for the most obvious cases, p chart and c chart decision models will outperform inexperienced auditors, with no SPC training, at assessing performance stability, when the auditors' decisions are based strictly on visual analyses of efficiency measurement data supplemented with lines representing estimates of process average and spread. However, the relative power of X charts to correctly signal stability and instability is less than satisfactory.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是调查控制图作为决策辅助工具的潜在价值,这些价值可用于运营审核员的生产效率评估的一个重要方面:基于对产出/投入比的分析和相关的绩效指标,对生产过程稳定性进行评估。两个主题小组根据对以表格和图形格式显示的效率测量数据的分析,评估了假设生产过程的稳定性。呈现给第二个主题组的图表补充了中心线和控制极限,以及这些线所代表的简要说明。除了比较两个主题组的决策准确性外,研究人员还将每个组的决策准确性与(1)等于随机准确性的基准和(2)统计过程控制(SPC)模型的决策准确性进行了比较。相对于使用计算机模拟建模的“真实”过程状态来衡量决策准确性。还比较了两个主题组的平均决策置信度。研究人员得出结论,没有经验的审计师(如本实验中经验丰富的审计学生所代表),没有经过SPC培训,就不能始终如一地以高于预期的速度进行正确的稳定性评估。如果他们的评估完全基于对以表格和图形格式显示的效率测量数据的视觉分析,则是偶然的。此外,在不解释如何在进行稳定性评估的过程中使用这种增量信息的情况下,对过程平均和分布的估计不会显着提高此类决策的准确性或可信度。除最明显的情况外,在没有经过SPC培训的情况下,在评估绩效稳定性时,p图表和c图表决策模型的表现将优于没有经验的审计师,此时,审计师的决策严格基于效率测量数据的可视化分析,并辅以代表估算值的线进程平均数和传播。但是,X图表正确表示信号的稳定性和不稳定性的相对功效并不令人满意。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reding, Kurt F.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Tennessee.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Tennessee.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号