首页> 外文学位 >A response to rationalism: Edmund Burke and the contemporary turn to traditions.
【24h】

A response to rationalism: Edmund Burke and the contemporary turn to traditions.

机译:对理性主义的回应:埃德蒙·伯克(Edmund Burke)和当代转向传统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The contemporary turn to traditions in social and political theory, exemplified in the works of Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Walzer, can be distinguished from other forms of traditionalism by the emphasis placed on a critical engagement with traditions. In critical traditionalism traditions are understood to embody debates and disagreements over their meaning, their scope, and their validity. It is argued that a turn to traditions offers the possibility of a politics in which the history and experience of past generations mattered. I also show that a politics with remembrance enhances the rationality of political action. I argue that neither Walzer nor MacIntyre adequately concern themselves with the issue of how we are related to traditions and to the past. How is it that we ought to find ourselves "in" a web of traditions? In Edmund Burke's concept of inheritance we find an articulate view of how one might understand oneself as part of a tradition. I examine to what extent Burkean living in tradition is compatible with a critical appropriation of tradition. My interpretation stresses the strong emotional resonance of the term "inheritance" and the way in which it is a reflection of family life. I conclude that criticism "within the family" may be subject to various difficulties, including the fear of offending the "fathers"; but I also argue that Burke's understanding of practical politics and the need to keep the language of justice from becoming platitudinous goes some distance toward mitigating these difficulties. I pursue the question of our relationship to traditions a bit further when I discuss Milan Kundera's Unbearable Lightness of Being and Alfred Doeblin's Karl and Rosa. Kundera challenges the turn to traditions with his notion of kitsch. Doeblin challenges the view developed in the dissertation that our recollection of deceased relations (our dead ancestors for instance) may mediate a relationship to the past that is also critical.
机译:通过强调与传统的批判性交往,可以将当代转向社会和政治理论的传统,例如阿拉斯代尔·麦金太尔(Alasdair MacIntyre)和迈克尔·沃尔泽(Michael Walzer)的作品,与其他形式的传统主义区分开。在批判的传统主义中,传统被理解为在其含义,范围和有效性上体现了辩论和分歧。有人认为,转向传统提供了政治上可能影响后代历史和经验的可能性。我还表明,具有纪念意义的政治可以增强政治行动的合理性。我认为,沃尔泽和麦金太尔都没有充分关注我们与传统和过去的关系问题。我们应该如何“在”传统网络中找到自己?在埃德蒙·伯克(Edmund Burke)的继承概念中,我们清楚地了解了人们如何将自己理解为传统的一部分。我考察了生活在传统中的伯克在何种程度上与对传统的批判性占有相称。我的解释强调了“继承”一词的强烈情感共鸣,以及反映家庭生活的方式。我得出的结论是,“家庭内部”的批评可能会遇到各种困难,包括害怕冒犯“父亲”。但是我也认为,伯克对实践政治的理解以及防止正义语言泛滥成灾的必要性,在缓解这些困难方面有一段距离。当我讨论米兰·昆德拉(Milk Kundera)的“难以忍受的存在”和阿尔弗雷德·多布林(Alfred Doeblin)的卡尔和罗莎(Karl and Rosa)时,我会进一步探讨我们与传统的关系问题。昆德拉(Kundera)用媚俗的概念挑战了向传统的转变。 Doeblin对论文中提出的观点提出了挑战,即我们对已故关系的回忆(例如我们已故的祖先)可能会调解与过去的关系,这一关系也至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ploog, William Henry.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1989
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号