首页> 外文学位 >Rural energy planning and development in the Third World: A multicriteria evaluation approach.
【24h】

Rural energy planning and development in the Third World: A multicriteria evaluation approach.

机译:第三世界的农村能源规划与发展:一种多标准评估方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past two decades rural development has been a major concern for many Third World governments. Yet most of the attempted rural development initiatives have failed. A major cause has been the deteriorating rural energy situation, characterized both by the growing shortage of traditional fuels (primarily fuelwood, charcoal, animal dung and agricultural residues) and the rising cost of commercial fuels (mainly kerosene, diesel and electricity).;Several approaches to a solution of the rural energy problem have been attempted. These include centralized rural electrification, policies for improving rural energy end-use efficiency, and technologies based on renewable energy resources. Yet, again, there have been many outright failures. These failures can be attributed to deficiencies, found at several levels, in the rural energy planning approaches which have been adopted. At the highest level there are flaws in the overall "top-down" development planning framework within which rural energy planning has been practised; at the intermediate level there are limitations in the philosophical approaches used in the planning of the rural energy projects themselves; and at the lowest level there are weaknesses in the techniques used for rural energy project evaluation.;An alternative model for Third World rural energy planning is proposed. Based on the theory of multicriteria evaluation, this new approach remedies several of the defects of past rural energy planning approaches. It is predicated on a "bottom-up" paradigm of development planning, and uses a rural energy evaluation technique very different from the now dominant cost-benefit approaches.;The new rural energy planning model is operationalized for the case of rural Kenya. Using household data from a 1981 rural energy survey of Kenya, six households are selected representing three different ecological zones and several different socioeconomic groups. Their energy decision-making behavior is then analyzed for several sets of assumptions. The resulting energy decisions are found to be quite similar to recommendations made in the literature. The multicriteria evaluation approach is also shown to be quite promising for planning in other Third World resource sectors.
机译:在过去的二十年中,农村发展一直是许多第三世界政府关注的主要问题。然而,大多数尝试的农村发展计划都以失败告终。一个主要的原因是农村能源状况的恶化,其特点是传统燃料(主要是薪柴,木炭,动物粪便和农业残留物)的短缺日益增加,以及商业燃料(主要是煤油,柴油和电力)的成本不断上升。已经尝试了解决农村能源问题的方法。这些措施包括中央农村电气化,提高农村能源最终利用效率的政策以及基于可再生能源的技术。但是,再次有很多彻底的失败。这些失败可归因于已采用的农村能源规划方法在多个层面上发现的缺陷。在最高层次上,在整个“自上而下”的发展规划框架中存在缺陷,在该框架中已经实施了农村能源规划。在中级水平上,用于农村能源项目本身规划的哲学方法是有局限的;在最低层次上,农村能源项目评估所使用的技术存在缺陷。;提出了第三世界农村能源规划的替代模型。基于多准则评估的理论,该新方法弥补了过去农村能源规划方法的一些缺陷。它以发展规划的“自下而上”范式为基础,并使用了与现在占主导地位的成本效益方法大不相同的农村能源评估技术。新的农村能源规划模型已针对肯尼亚农村实施。利用1981年肯尼亚农村能源调查中的家庭数据,选择了代表三个不同生态区和几个不同社会经济群体的六个家庭。然后针对几种假设分析他们的能源决策行为。发现产生的能量决策与文献中的建议非常相似。对于第三世界其他资源部门的规划,多标准评估方法也显示出很大的希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ramphall, Davin.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Geography.;Energy.;Urban planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 378 p.
  • 总页数 378
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号