首页> 外文学位 >Reaching the poorest through microfinance: Learning from saving for change program in Mali.
【24h】

Reaching the poorest through microfinance: Learning from saving for change program in Mali.

机译:通过小额信贷达到最贫困的人群:从马里的零钱储蓄计划中学习。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study used secondary data to analyze the Saving for Change (SfC) program of Oxfam America in Mali. SfC uses a model of microfinance that is based on education and savings-led approach and self-help methodology. The program teaches the poorest women how to form and manage a group to handle savings and credit related needs. The group learns to systematically collect savings from its members; lend the money to its members with interest and keep a record of all transactions. SfC has created an oral recordkeeping system which is helpful for groups that have mostly or all illiterate women. The SfC women also learn about other social components such as malaria through their participation in the program. This study, however, focused only on the financial activities of the women.;The secondary data analyzed in this study were collected by Oxfam America in two rounds of surveys that used mixed methods instruments. Both surveys were conducted in October and November, one in 2005 and the other in 2006. Most of the data collected from the surveys were quantitative. They were collected for Oxfam America's own purposes and only some of them were used for this study.;The study used three aspects of outreach---depth, scope and worth to the user---as the framework to explore the extent to which SfC had reached the poorest women. Three overarching questions were constructed, one to explore each of these aspects of outreach. They were: Were the women served by SfC poorer than other women who were not served? Did the SfC women utilize the program benefits? Did the utilization of the program benefits vary based on the women's economic levels?;Each overarching question also had a set of main and specific questions. Some key economic indicators such as the women's literacy and schooling at the individual level and the ratio of school age children in school, food security, assets and the ratio of income contributors at the household level, as well as select program benefits such as savings and loans were used for determining the main and specific questions. Various statistical tests including one-way ANOVA, paired samples t-tests and bivariate correlations were performed to answer those questions.;Most of the results of the statistical tests did not provide a clear answer whether or not SfC reached the poorest of the poor. Out of the four indicators, three showed that the women reached by SfC were as poor as the women in the control group. The SfC women were statistically significantly better off, as measured by household assets, compared to the other women in the area.;The results of the paired samples t-tests showed that the SfC women utilized the benefits offered by the program, and their utilization was higher in 2006 than in 2005. Except for a few instances, the women's utilization of the program benefits did not appear to have been influenced by their economic levels. None of their saving activities were significantly affected by their household economic levels. Their willingness to take loans also did not appear to be influenced by the difference in their household economic levels in a meaningful way.;Although mixed, these findings adequately rejected the notion that Oxfam America had failed to reach the poorest of the poor. However, the results did not show that the women reached by SfC were the poorest. Future studies and collection of additional data may provide more conclusive findings about the level of poverty of the women reached by the program and the extent to which the very poorest benefitted equally from the services.;Whether or not the results were statistically significant and all women were the poorest, the experiences gained by the women and the groups from their participation in SfC spoke directly to the core purpose of the program and to the economic benefits for the clients by any international standard. When their context was taken into consideration, poor women of one of the world's poorest countries in the villages where there are very few or no opportunities became economically active in the SfC program. The level of engagement of the women was an important step forward toward reducing poverty. Regardless of their economic levels, those poor women saved a remarkable amount of money; borrowed money from the group; repaid loans with interest; and, most importantly, managed a financial system as a group to serve their financial needs.
机译:这项研究使用辅助数据来分析马里“乐施会”美国的“变革储蓄”计划。 SfC使用基于教育和储蓄主导的方法以及自助方法的小额信贷模型。该计划教最贫穷的妇女如何组建和管理一个小组,以处理储蓄和信贷相关需求。该小组学习从其成员系统地收集储蓄;将这笔钱有兴趣地借给其成员,并保留所有交易记录。证监会建立了口头记录保存系统,该系统对大多数文盲妇女或全部文盲妇女有用。 SfC妇女还通过参加该计划来了解其他社会因素,例如疟疾。但是,本研究仅关注女性的财务活动。本研究中分析的次要数据是由乐施会美国分两轮使用混合方法工具的调查收集的。两项调查分别于10月和11月进行,一次于2005年,另一次于2006年进行。从调查中收集的大多数数据都是定量的。它们是为美国乐施会的目的而收集的,仅部分用于本研究。该研究使用了三个方面的扩展-深度,范围和对用户的价值-作为框架来探索SfC已惠及最贫困的妇女。构建了三个总体问题,一个问题探索了扩展的各个方面。他们是:SfC服务的妇女是否比其他没有服务的妇女差? SfC妇女是否利用了该计划的好处?方案收益的利用是否根据妇女的经济水平而有所不同?;每个总体问题也都有一系列主要和具体问题。一些关键的经济指标,例如妇女的个人识字率和受教育程度,在校儿童的学龄儿童比例,粮食安全,资产和家庭收入贡献者的比例,以及某些方案的收益,例如储蓄和贷款用于确定主要问题和具体问题。进行了包括单向方差分析,配对样本t检验和双变量相关性在内的各种统计检验来回答这些问题。;大多数统计检验的结果都没有明确说明SfC是否达到了穷人中的最贫穷者。在这四项指标中,有三项表明,美国证监会接触到的妇女与对照组中的妇女一样贫穷。按家庭资产衡量,与该地区的其他女性相比,SfC女性的状况明显好于其他女性。配对样本t检验的结果表明,SfC女性利用了该计划提供的收益及其利用2006年比2005年有所增加。除少数情况外,妇女对方案福利的利用似乎不受其经济水平的影响。他们的储蓄活动没有受到家庭经济水平的重大影响。他们的贷款意愿似乎也没有受到家庭经济水平差异的有意义的影响。尽管这些因素混杂在一起,但这些发现充分否定了乐施会美国未能惠及穷人中最贫困者的观点。但是,结果并未表明,经SfC接触的妇女是最贫困的。未来的研究和其他数据的收集可能会提供关于该计划所达到的妇女贫困水平以及最贫困人口从服务中平等受益的程度的更结论性的结论。无论结果是否具有统计学意义,所有妇女最贫穷的是,妇女和团体从参加SfC中获得的经验直接说明了该计划的核心目的,并以任何国际标准都为客户带来了经济利益。当考虑到她们的情况时,在世界上最贫穷的国家之一的村庄中,机会很少或没有机会的贫穷妇女开始参与SfC计划的经济活动。妇女的参与水平是朝着减少贫困迈出的重要一步。不管她们的经济水平如何,这些贫穷的妇女都节省了可观的钱。向集团借钱;偿还有息贷款;最重要的是,作为一个整体来管理财务系统以满足他们的财务需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Acharya, Mukul.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Education Finance.;Womens Studies.;Education Adult and Continuing.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号