首页> 外文学位 >Beyond political obligation: Reconceptualizing the individual's relationship to political institutions.
【24h】

Beyond political obligation: Reconceptualizing the individual's relationship to political institutions.

机译:超越政治义务:重新概念化个人与政治机构的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Political obligation has been the dominant concept to explain individual obedience to political institutions. It claims that a free individual has performed some voluntary act which generate a new set of moral requirements to support and comply with a particular set of political institutions. However the concept of political obligation has come under successful attack, rendering all existing formulations inadequate. This project explicitly abandons the language of political obligation, and presents an understanding political institutions that are not obligatory. I begin by reviewing the recent defenses of political obligation, and show that none consider all of the relevant critiques that have been used to reject the political obligation narrative. After the inadequacy of the current formulations has been shown, I return to the early modern writings on political obligation to consider the political relations of individuals who had no political obligations: foreigners. Once it has been shown that social cooperation with foreigners is possible without political obligations, I utilize Thoreau to show how citizens might behave as foreigners, through his formulation of sojourning. While the relations of foreigners and sojourners do much to explain social cooperation without political obligation, there remains a need to reconceptualize the law. To do this, I suggest that we understand the law not as a system of summary rules, but rather as what Rawls calls rules of practice. Finally, in the absence of political obligation, Hobbes is utilized to show that the state's need to use coercive force can be based on the right of war, rather than the right of punishment derived from a set of special obligations. It is ultimately argued that political obligation is unnecessary as a concept to explain an individual's relationship to particular political institutions, and that we should move our language beyond political obligation.
机译:政治义务一直是解释个人对政治制度的服从的主要概念。它声称一个自由的人已经执行了一些自愿行为,这些行为产生了一套新的道德要求,以支持和遵守一套特定的政治制度。但是,政治义务的概念遭到了成功的抨击,使所有现有的表述都不足够。该项目明确放弃了政治义务的语言,并提出了对非强制性政治机构的理解。首先,我回顾一下最近对政治义务的辩护,并表明没有人考虑所有被用来拒绝政治义务叙述的相关批评。在显示了当前措词的不足之后,我回到关于政治义务的早期现代著作中来考虑没有政治义务的个人(外国人)的政治关系。一旦证明在没有政治义务的情况下就可以与外国人进行社会合作,我将利用梭罗通过他的居留方式来展示公民如何表现为外国人。尽管外国人和居留者的关系在没有政治义务的情况下可以很好地解释社会合作,但仍然需要重新构想法律。为此,我建议我们不要将法律理解为即决规则体系,而应将其理解为罗尔斯所谓的实践规则。最后,在没有政治义务的情况下,霍布斯被用来表明国家使用强制力的需要可以基于战争权,而不是基于一系列特殊义务的惩罚权。最终有人争论说,政治义务作为解释个人与特定政治制度之间关系的概念是不必要的,我们应该将语言超越政治义务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hughes, Thomas Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号