首页> 外文学位 >Kant's two-tiered response to scepticism.
【24h】

Kant's two-tiered response to scepticism.

机译:康德对怀疑主义的两层反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Kant is supposed to have responded to Hume's scepticism by showing in the Critique of Pure Reason that concepts such as causality are structural components of experience and knowledge. This thesis argues that Kant's response to Hume's scepticism is best understood as two-tiered, beginning in the Critique of Pure Reason and continuing in the Critique of Judgment.;The first tier is the construction of a framework of possible experience and the second is the development of a principle of systematicity in knowledge. Traditionally the framework of possible experience has been interpreted so strongly as to shoulder most of the burden of the response to scepticism, which negatively affects not only the framework itself, but also the construal of the principle of systematicity, making it fundamentally heuristic rather than constructive. This thesis will be arguing that the framework of possible experience must be construed in a much weaker fashion, not only to resolve its own problems but to pave the way for a more solid grounding of the role of the principle of systematicity.
机译:康德应该对休ume的怀疑作出回应,他在《纯粹理性批判》中表明因果关系等概念是经验和知识的结构性组成部分。本论文认为,康德对休ume怀疑论的回应最好理解为两层,从纯理性批判开始,再到审判批判继续。第一层是可能经验框架的构建,第二层是可能经验框架的构建。发展知识系统性原则。传统上,对可能经验的框架的解释如此强烈,以至于承担了对怀疑主义作出回应的大部分负担,这不仅对框架本身产生负面影响,而且对系统性原则的建构也产生负面影响,使其从根本上启发而不是建设性。本文将论证,必须以一种较弱的方式来解释可能的经验框架,这不仅是为了解决其自身的问题,而且为为系统性原则的作用奠定更坚实的基础铺平了道路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rajiva, Sumangali.;

  • 作者单位

    Concordia University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Concordia University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:50:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号