首页> 外文学位 >Shaking the foundations of violent civil conflict: Institutions, disasters, and the political economies of state-rebel interaction.
【24h】

Shaking the foundations of violent civil conflict: Institutions, disasters, and the political economies of state-rebel interaction.

机译:动摇暴力内战的基础:制度,灾难和国家与叛乱分子互动的政治经济。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What is the effect of natural disasters on political violence? Despite the widespread speculation about the possibilities for peace that typically occurs after a natural disaster strikes in a conflict zone, relatively little is known about the way disasters impact political mechanisms. In this project, I find that post-disaster strategic dynamics around control of disaster relief institutions are likely to impact levels of grievance and feasibility and thus have important implications for the likelihood of post-disaster violence. Using time-series, cross-sectional data, I find that post-disaster violence is more likely where pre-disaster institutional quality is relatively weak, as weak institutions create incentives for institution capture. A qualitative comparison of Indonesia and Sri Lanka following the 2004 tsunami suggests that post-disaster violence also depends on patterns of institutional control at the time of the disaster. The disaster results in a "lock-in" effect, accelerating and magnifying the material and non-material benefits of institutional control. These changes alter levels of grievance and the opportunities for rebellion.;This project makes two theoretical contributions. First, in contributing to the research on "disaster diplomacy," it suggests that political variables are affected by natural disasters but not necessarily in transformative ways. Instead, natural disasters help lock-in and even accelerate political processes already in place in the time before the disaster. Second, viewing natural disasters as "crises" or "focusing events," suggests that battles over institutional control can define and re-define the micro-foundations, and often the dynamic evolution, of intrastate conflict as much as they can define the endpoints of conflict. The material and signaling benefits of institutional control change the incentive structures of both rebels and states around rebellion.
机译:自然灾害对政治暴力有何影响?尽管人们普遍猜测在冲突地区发生自然灾害后通常会发生和平的可能性,但人们对灾害影响政治机制的方式知之甚少。在这个项目中,我发现围绕救灾机构控制的灾后战略动态可能会影响人们的不满和可行性,因此对灾后暴力的可能性具有重要意义。使用时间序列的横截面数据,我发现在灾前机构质量相对较弱的情况下,灾后暴力更有可能发生,因为脆弱的机构会为诱捕机构提供动力。 2004年海啸后对印度尼西亚和斯里兰卡的定性比较表明,灾后暴力行为还取决于灾难发生时的制度控制模式。灾难导致“锁定”效应,加速并扩大了机构控制的物质和非物质利益。这些变化改变了人们的不满和反抗的机会。首先,在为“灾难外交”的研究做出贡献时,它表明政治变量受自然灾害的影响,但不一定以变革的方式受到影响。取而代之的是,自然灾害有助于锁定甚至加速灾难发生前已经存在的政治进程。其次,将自然灾害视为“危机”或“重点事件”,这表明与制度控制的斗争可以定义并重新定义州内冲突的微观基础,通常是动态演变,就像它们可以定义危机的终点一样多。冲突。制度控制的物质利益和信号利益改变了叛乱分子和叛乱国家的激励结构。

著录项

  • 作者

    Enia, Jason S.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 187 p.
  • 总页数 187
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号