首页> 外文学位 >A qualitative analysis of the process of developing and implementing do not resuscitate and degrees of intervention policy in long term care settings in British Columbia.
【24h】

A qualitative analysis of the process of developing and implementing do not resuscitate and degrees of intervention policy in long term care settings in British Columbia.

机译:在不列颠哥伦比亚省的长期护理环境中,对制定和实施过程的定性分析并不能使干预政策的程度得到恢复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This descriptive qualitative study examines the process of developing and implementing policies on two types of advance directives, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Degrees of Intervention (DI), in Long Term Care (LTC) facilities in British Columbia.; A thematic analysis of the qualitative data illuminated several findings. Respondents identified feelings of uncertainty, fear of legal sanctions, concern for resident rights to self-determination and the desire for residents to die in place as problems related to DNR and DI prior to the release of the 1989 guidelines.; Consequently, the respondents described a process of first clarifying these problematic situations and then defining specific procedural and moral circumstances that required action. The definitive problems which emerged involve not only unwritten agency policy, but unclear doctor's orders, absent and existing legislation, divergent value perspectives on resident autonomy and the meaning of death in LTC facilities.; The process of developing and implementing agency policy on DNR and DI was enhanced by the information provided in the 1989 provincial government guideline documents. Additionally, individual attitudes, group perspectives both internal and external to LTC facilities, and structural and functional components of the LTC organization were identified as influences on the policy development process. Five distinct types of policy paths that led to development of DNR and DI policy were evident. Eventual approval of a DNR or DI policy in a LTC facility resulted from a process of consensus encompassing many different perspectives.; The respondents described a number of unique factors which influenced implementation of DNR and DI. These include individual styles of communicating the policy issue, the amount of time available to discuss the policy, and the degree education (basic and inservice) of care staff and doctors around issues related to, DNR and DI. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:这项描述性的定性研究考察了不列颠哥伦比亚省的长期护理(LTC)设施中两种类型的预先指示的制定和实施政策的过程,这些指示是“请勿复苏(DNR)”和“干预程度(DI)”。对定性数据的主题分析揭示了一些发现。受访者认为不确定感,对法律制裁的恐惧,对居民自决权的担忧以及对居民死亡的渴望是与1989年指南发布之前DNR和DI有关的问题。因此,受访者描述了一个过程,首先要弄清这些有问题的情况,然后定义需要采取行动的特定程序和道德情况。最终出现的问题不仅涉及不成文的代理政策,而且还涉及医生的命令不明确,缺少和现有的立法,对居民自治的价值观念分歧以及LTC设施中死亡的含义。 1989年省政府指南文件中提供的信息加强了制定和实施DNR和DI代理政策的过程。此外,LTC机构内部和外部的个人态度,团体观点以及LTC组织的结构和功能组件也被确定为对政策制定过程的影响。显而易见,五种不同类型的政策路径导致了DNR和DI政策的发展。 LTC设施最终批准了DNR或DI政策,这是由包含许多不同观点的共识过程引起的。受访者描述了许多影响DNR和DI实施的独特因素。其中包括传达政策问题的个人风格,可讨论政策的时间量,以及与DNR和DI有关的问题的护理人员和医生的学历教育(基础和在职)。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Laughlin, Diane Gail.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Victoria (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Victoria (Canada).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.
  • 学位 M.N.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号