首页> 外文学位 >The long span. Intercultural exchange in building technology: Development and industrialization of the framed beam in Western Europe and the United States, 1820-1870.
【24h】

The long span. Intercultural exchange in building technology: Development and industrialization of the framed beam in Western Europe and the United States, 1820-1870.

机译:大跨度。建筑技术中的跨文化交流:1820年至1870年在西欧和美国,框架梁的开发和产业化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Industrialized construction transformed our environment during the nineteenth century. A comprehensive study of this development, however, is lacking. In this dissertation, the response to this problem includes an examination of the cultural and technological interrelationships which advanced the design and construction of the framed beam bridge in France, the German states, the United States, and Britain during the nineteenth century.; Standard historical interpretations have mystified the processes of civil engineering: enlightenment through science, development by evolution, classification by material, and explanation through nationalism have become ingrained themes. As an antidote, the concept of intercultural exchange is introduced here. Exchange allows an examination of invention and technological development while avoiding biological analogies, "technology transfer," and "national character," concepts which often incorporate notions of progress and superiority and cannot account for the complexity of technological development.; Ithiel Town's lattice bridge (patented 1820) is the object of this intercultural study. The invention of the structure is examined. How did various cultures define and select a structural system and judge those of other countries? How did engineers present and interpret what they saw? What were the consequences of these interpretations for "practice," "theory," and "culture"? These questions are discussed. The great divides between wood and iron, American and European, scientific and practical, rational and irrational, are shown to be anything but concrete. Moreover, the systematization of the building process is revealed as a critical development in modern history. Both technological process and product are shown to be intercultural developments.
机译:19世纪,工业化建筑改变了我们的环境。但是,对此发展缺乏全面的研究。在这篇论文中,对这个问题的回应包括对文化和技术的相互关系的研究,这种关系促进了19世纪法国,德国,美国和英国的框架式梁桥的设计和建造。标准的历史解释掩盖了土木工程的过程:科学的启蒙,进化的发展,物质的分类以及民族主义的解释已成为根深蒂固的主题。作为解毒剂,这里介绍了跨文化交流的概念。交换可以审查发明和技术发展,同时避免使用生物类比,“技术转让”和“国家特征”等概念,这些概念通常包含进步和优越性的概念,不能说明技术发展的复杂性。 Ithiel Town的格子桥(已获专利的1820年)是这项跨文化研究的对象。研究了该结构的发明。各种文化如何定义和选择结构体系并评判其他国家的结构体系?工程师如何呈现和解释他们所看到的?这些解释对“实践”,“理论”和“文化”的影响是什么?讨论了这些问题。木材与铁,美国与欧洲,科学与实践,理性与非理性之间的巨大鸿沟被证明并非是具体的。此外,建筑过程的系统化被揭示为现代历史上的关键发展。技术过程和产品都被证明是跨文化的发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dreicer, Gregory K.;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Cornell University.;
  • 学科 History of Science.; History Modern.; Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1993
  • 页码 579 p.
  • 总页数 579
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学史;现代史(1917年~);建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号