首页> 外文学位 >Raising the veil of history: Orientalism, classicism and the birth of western civilization in Hegel's Berlin lecture courses of the 1820's.
【24h】

Raising the veil of history: Orientalism, classicism and the birth of western civilization in Hegel's Berlin lecture courses of the 1820's.

机译:揭开历史的面纱:东方主义,古典主义和西方文明的诞生在1820年代黑格尔的柏林讲课中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the architecture of Hegel's system posits a singular world-historical Subject evolving from China to Berlin, it punctuates this ascent with sharp divisions and fractures. In the most pronounced caesura, Hegel enshrines a cultural and historical polarization of East and West, distinguishing the two realms as despotic and free. Although Hegel's antithesis of Asia and Europe sometimes assumes the proportions of an invariant and atemporal duality, this bifurcation actually ensues from a dialectical process of de-familiarization and estrangement. Hegel's narrative of self-consciousness is founded upon the assumption of a determinate Eastern origin, an origin whose heteronomous character becomes intelligible only once it has been surpassed and intro-reflected by the Occident. Genealogically traced to its Eastern source, Hegel's Subject simultaneously incorporates and disavows the Orient recuperating and renouncing its own internal alterity.;Explicitly thematizing the problems of Orientalism and historicism, this dissertation examines Hegel's relation to contemporary scholarly research in Asian and Classical studies. In particular, I assess the problems that these nascent disciplines pose for the writing of history and for the concept of a monist historical subject. By reawakening the memories of lost civilizations and reclaiming their forgotten voices, the European "will to knowledge" ultimately reshaped and dislodged the quasi-mythical paradigms sustaining Hegel's grand narrative. For good dialectical reasons, the meta-subject epistemologically self-destructed. It is the purpose of this dissertation to think through the predicament of delegitimation and to indicate strategic domains in which Hegel both resisted and accommodated the encroachment of history upon his narrative of self-consciousness. Insofar as the source material permits, I will distinguish between the older master narratives from the early 1820's as well as Hegel's efforts later in the decade to repolarize an East and West opposition once he realized that this difference had ceased to be tenable.
机译:黑格尔体系的体系结构假定了一个从中国发展到柏林的独特的世界历史主题,但它却以尖锐的分裂和断裂为标志而上升。在最明显的凯撒罗戏中,黑格尔奉行东西方的文化和历史两极化,将专制和自由两个领域区别开来。尽管黑格尔关于亚洲和欧洲的对立有时会假定不变和时空对立的比例,但这种分歧实际上是由于不熟悉和疏远的辩证过程造成的。黑格尔关于自我意识的叙述是建立在一个确定的东方血统的假设上的,东方血统只有在被西方人超越和反思后,其异质性才变得可理解。黑格尔的《家谱》从家谱学上追溯到其东方渊源,同时并入并拒绝了东方的调养和摒弃其自身的内部变化。我特别评估了这些新兴学科对历史写作和一元历史学科概念提出的问题。通过唤醒失落文明的记忆并恢复他们遗忘的声音,欧洲的“知识意志”最终重塑并取代了维持黑格尔宏伟叙事的准神话范式。由于良好的辩证理由,该元主题在认识论上是自我毁灭的。本文的目的是思考非合法化的困境,并指出黑格尔既在其自觉性叙事中抵制和包容历史侵略的战略领域。在原始资料允许的范围内,我将区分1820年代初期的较老的主要叙述以及黑格尔在十年后为使东西方反对派重新极化而做出的努力,一旦他意识到这种分歧已不再成立。

著录项

  • 作者

    Harten, Stuart Jay.;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Cornell University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 451 p.
  • 总页数 451
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;现代史(1917年~);
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:55
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号