首页> 外文学位 >The 'Liber Pontificalis Ecclesiae Ravennatis': Critical edition and commentary.
【24h】

The 'Liber Pontificalis Ecclesiae Ravennatis': Critical edition and commentary.

机译:“拉韦纳宗座教堂的书”:批评版和评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For over three centuries, the Liber Pontificalis Ecclesiae Ravennatis (LPR), written in the 830's and 840's by Andreas Agnellus of Ravenna, has been 'mined' for facts about early medieval Ravenna by historians and art historians, and criticized for its inadequacies. Agnellus' models, motives, and historiographical methods all affect the way that information is presented, yet these factors have never been closely examined. In this dissertation, I provide a new edition of the Latin text, with new notes, and a commentary that examines the way in which Agnellus arranged and compiled his text. The three genres that contributed to the makeup of the LPR, all of which are specifically related to bishops--gesta episcoporum, hagiography, and sermons--are examined, and specific works that influenced Agnellus are identified and discussed, in particular the Roman Liber Pontificalis and the works of Gregory of Tours, Gregory the Great, and Peter Chrysologus. Agnellus' historical methodology is explained, namely, that he included information only when the name of a bishop of Ravenna in his source told him where it belonged chronologically. Each of Agnellus' sources, and the use he made of it, is examined in turn.;Mentions of art and architecture, apparently based on Agnellus' personal experience, perform several different functions within the text. The descriptions of art and architecture are examined in the contexts of the type of discourse in which they appear, and the sources from which Agnellus learned about them. It becomes clear that the language that he used in each passage is influenced by the context and function of that passage, as well as by the language of his sources and models; a glossary of terms, with a discussion of the context and sources for each, is included. The relation of the LPR to the two main political and cultural watersheds of the ninth century, the Carolingian Renaissance and the Iconoclastic Controversy, is examined. Finally, the history of the text in its various manuscript versions, and the explanation of the edition that follows, as well as a planned published edition, are presented.
机译:在过去的三个多世纪中,拉文纳的安德烈亚斯·阿涅尔卢斯(Andreas Agnellus)在830和840年代写的自由教宗拉文纳提斯(LPR)被历史学家和艺术史学家“挖掘”为关于中世纪早期拉文纳的事实,并因其不足之处而受到批评。 Agnellus的模型,动机和历史学方法都会影响信息呈现的方式,但是从未仔细检查过这些因素。在这篇论文中,我提供了一个新的拉丁文本版本,带有新的注释,以及一条评论,该评论探讨了Agnellus安排和编辑他的文本的方式。考察了构成LPR的三种流派,所有这三种流派都与主教特别相关-gesta主教,流言术和布道-进行了研究,并确定并讨论了影响Agnellus的具体作品,特别是《罗马自由》 Pontificalis以及Gregory of Tours,Gregory大帝和Peter Chrysologus的作品。阿格涅卢斯(Agnellus)的历史方法论得到了解释,也就是说,只有当拉文纳(Ravenna)的一位主教的名字在其来源中按时间顺序告诉他时,他才提供信息。依次检查每个Agnellus的来源及其用途。显然基于Agnellus的个人经验的艺术和建筑构想在文本中执行了几种不同的功能。对艺术和建筑的描述是根据它们出现的话语类型以及阿涅尔卢斯从中获悉的内容来进行考察的。很明显,他在每个段落中使用的语言都受到该段落的上下文和功能以及他的来源和模型的语言的影响;包含术语表,并讨论了每种术语的上下文和来源。考察了LPR与九世纪两个主要的政治和文化分水岭-加洛林文艺复兴和反偶像之争的关系。最后,介绍了各种手稿版本的文本历史,以及随后版本的说明以及计划中的出版版本。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Literature Medieval.;History Medieval.;Art History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 693 p.
  • 总页数 693
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号