首页> 外文学位 >Russian romanticism and theologically founded aesthetics: Zhukovskij, Odoevskij, and Gogol and the appropriation of post-Kantian aesthetic principles
【24h】

Russian romanticism and theologically founded aesthetics: Zhukovskij, Odoevskij, and Gogol and the appropriation of post-Kantian aesthetic principles

机译:俄国浪漫主义和有神学基础的美学:Zhukovskij,Odoevskij和Gogol以及对后康德美学原则的挪用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The history of thought and art from the late eighteenth century through the early nineteenth century marks a period where the areas of philosophy, theology, and aesthetics represented not separate entities but were instead melded into a unity predicated on a redefined relationship between the individual and God. The birth of Romanticism built upon this redefined role of the subject (the self), and figures in both England and Germany focused specifically on the subject's creation of art (aesthetics) as a conduit for knowledge (epistemology) of the divine (theology). Whereas Romanticism in Germany and England arose "organically" in the innovations of belletrists such as Schlegel, Novalis, Wordsworth, and Coleridge, Russian Romanticism, by contrast, was not native born. In the early nineteenth century, certain Russian poets and thinkers begin to assimilate the tenets of the Romantic program within a Russian context. The result was a strong tradition in Russian literature, which espoused this same idea of perceiving the divine in the aesthetic acts of artistic creation and reception. Three of the most influential figures in Russian nineteenth-century literature, Zhukovskij, Odoevskij, and Gogol, specifically advocated the Romantic ideas of: a noumenological sphere beyond sensible reality, the subject's constant nearness to this suprasensible, noumenological sphere, and the capacity for art to bridge this divide and thus to lead the subject to knowledge of the suprasensible. Each of these thinkers defines the noumenological sphere according to a conception of God in a Christian context and consequently defines the elemental nature of art according to specifically theological-as-aesthetic terms.
机译:从18世纪末到19世纪初的思想和艺术史标志着一个时期,其中哲学,神学和美学领域不是代表独立的实体,而是融合为一个基于个体与上帝之间重新定义的关系的统一体。浪漫主义的诞生建立在主体(自我)这一重新定义的角色上,英格兰和德国的人物都特别关注主体的艺术创作(美学),作为对神圣(神学)知识(认识论)的传播渠道。而在德国和英格兰的浪漫主义是在诸如Schlegel,Novalis,Wordsworth和Coleridge这样的代言人的创新中“有机地”产生的,相比之下,俄罗斯浪漫主义并不是天生的。在19世纪初期,某些俄国诗人和思想家开始在俄国语境下吸收浪漫主义节目的宗旨。结果是俄罗斯文学中的悠久传统,拥护在艺术创作和接受的审美行为中感知神的相同观念。俄国19世纪文学中最有影响力的三个人物,茹科夫斯基,奥多耶夫斯基和果戈尔,特别提倡浪漫主义的观念:理性领域之外的本体论领域,主题与这一不可超越的本体论领域的不断接近以及艺术的能力弥合这种鸿沟,从而使主体了解超然的知识。这些思想家中的每一个都根据基督教背景下对上帝的概念来定义本体论领域,并因此根据专门的神学即美学术语来定义艺术的本质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swensen, Andrew Jon.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Slavic literature.;European history.;Philosophy of Religion.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 486 p.
  • 总页数 486
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号