首页> 外文学位 >The law and economics of administrative law: A statistical analysis of the Consumer Product Safety Commission's petition process.
【24h】

The law and economics of administrative law: A statistical analysis of the Consumer Product Safety Commission's petition process.

机译:行政法的法律和经济学:消费品安全委员会的请愿程序的统计分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study seeks to determine those factors influential in decision making at the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the primary federal agency charged with the regulation of unsafe consumer products. To make this determination, a statistical analysis was made of the Commission's petition process.; Under the petition process, non-Commission personnel would request that the Commission promulgate a safety standard. The Commission could grant the petition and undertake a regulatory project. Alternatively, the Commission could deny the petition either because the product did not present an unreasonable hazard or because voluntary safety standards sufficed to regulate the hazard.; A theoretical model was developed to examine what safety standard the Commission should mandate for a product given that consumer precaution, as well as the prevailing safety standard, lowers the likelihood of an accident. The analysis focused on the problem that consumers may respond to the regulatory mandate by reducing precaution (the "lulling effect"). The model shows that the importance of this lulling effect for Commission decision making depends upon the presence of consumer misperception of product risk.; To analyze the Commission's decisions on petitions, a multinomial logit model was estimated using as the dependent variable the Commission's decision. As independent variables, the model included a measure of product value to consumers, a combined measure of product risk and risk misperception, a dummy variable for whether a consumer group brought the petition and a dummy variable to control for changes in applicable administrative procedures. The coefficients of the product value and product risk measures were utilized to obtain the monetary value of an accident implicit in Commission decision making.; Other results of the model were that interest groups and the applicable procedural regime were significant in the Commission's decisions on mandatory standards. Conversely, for voluntary standards, the measures of product value and product risk were significant.
机译:这项研究旨在确定影响消费者产品安全委员会决策的那些因素,该委员会是负责管理不安全消费产品的主要联邦机构。为了做出这一决定,对委员会的请愿程序进行了统计分析。根据请愿程序,非委员会人员将要求委员会颁布安全标准。委员会可以批准请愿书并进行监管项目。或者,委员会可以拒绝该请愿,或者是因为该产品没有造成不合理的危害,或者是因为足以满足该危害的自愿性安全标准。鉴于消费者的预防措施以及现行的安全标准降低了事故发生的可能性,因此开发了一种理论模型来研究委员会应为产品规定什么安全标准。分析的重点是消费者可以通过减少预防措施(“拖拉效应”)来响应监管要求的问题。该模型表明,这种平息作用对委员会决策的重要性取决于消费者是否误解了产品风险。为了分析委员会关于请愿的决定,使用委员会决定作为因变量来估计多项式logit模型。作为自变量,模型包括对消费者的产品价值衡量,对产品风险和风险误解的组合衡量,用于确定消费者群体是否提出请愿的虚拟变量以及用于控制适用管理程序的变化的虚拟变量。利用产品价值和产品风险度量的系数来获得委员会决策中隐含的事故的货币价值。该模型的其他结果是,利益集团和适用的程序制度对委员会关于强制性标准的决定具有重要意义。相反,对于自愿性标准,产品价值和产品风险的度量很重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boustead, Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Law.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 136 p.
  • 总页数 136
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号